MEIN FUHRER, BERLIN IST JUDEN-FREI!
“My leader, Berlin is Jew-free”.
These words were spoken by Dr. Joseph Goebbels (NAZI Germany’s State Minister for Propaganda and Popular Enlightenment) to Adolph Hitler, founder of the National Socialist Party (NSDAP, shortened to NAZI) and dictator of Germany from 1933 to 1945. Goebbels was referring to Hitler’s command to make European capitals “Jew free” as soon as possible following German occupation. Goebbels spoke these words almost 70 years ago...
"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”
These words are from the Hamas charter; a vile document that spells out in chilling horror the fate all Jews will suffer at the hands of the Islamists. The followers and supporters of Hamas are in fact the spiritual and political children of the Nazi regime.
University Of Maryland Historian Prof. Jeffrey Herf states that during World War II:
"A confluence of Nazi anti-Semitism and Muslim fundamentalism did take place during the war which was a mixture of ideological affinity and shared political interests. Though Nazi Germany failed in its military and propaganda advances in the Middle East, the ideas it conveyed to the Arabs found adherence,"... pointing to the charter of Hamas, which was established in 1987 and grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood...The history of radical Islam must include the history of the interaction between
fascist Italy, Vichy France and above all Nazi Germany, and the radical Arab nationalists of the wartime years"
It is no accident that Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” (My Struggle) is a popular best-seller in the Middle East. Hitler’s book reads like the Hamas charter for each is a statement of pure, unadulterated hate. Both use God to justify their despicable quest to make the world “Juden-frei”. Yet, in truth, the God of the Nazis, of Hamas, and yes, of the founders and leaders of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) who advance the goals of Hamas, is an offense against the very essence of divinity.
Make no mistake, the “Allah” of the terrorists of Hamas and CAIR, the front group created by the Muslim Brotherhood, is a god of abhorrence; a spiteful, hateful and disgusting "being" that serves no other purpose than to justify the irrational hate of Islamist terrorists and those who support them. The Islamists perversion of God is nothing less than religious madness. Thus, is it any wonder that the majority of Muslims in North America came to our continent to free themselves from the religious disorder that permeates every Muslim-majority country on the planet? Is there a Muslim-majority country on Earth that even attempts to make a pretense to protect the “rights” of non-Muslims? Not really. What do Muslims in America know about the countries they left that we don’t?
CAIR claims to represent the “voice of Muslims” in North America. It does not. CAIR represents the voice of hate; the voice of Hamas; the voice of terror. CAIR is the representative of radical Islam in North America and has been from the day it was founded. This is why CAIR has never condemned Hamas. To condemn Hamas would mean condemning family.
CAIR-sponsored anti-Israel protesters displayed blatent support for Hamas and other terrorist organizations during recent rallies in America. When confronted with this behavior, CAIR-Chicago's Ahmed Rehab attempted to brush aside open support for terrorists by acknowledging that certain protesters should have been dealt with by the removal of their offensive banners and signs; however, Mr. Rehab then dismisses the disturbing events by attacking Israeli military actions against Hamas, adding:
"I find it appalling that some on the pro-Israeli side are better concerned with cardboard paper"
CAIR was founded following the notorious “Philadelphia meeting” in 1993.
At this meeting, attended by Muslim Brotherhood members, Hamas supporters and sympathizers, it was agreed “that a more organized and effective lobbying program was needed here to help their cause.” The FBI testified during the recent Holy Land Foundation trial that the creation of CAIR was one of the fruits of this meeting in Philadelphia. A meeting attended by Omar Ahmad and Nihad Awad.
CAIR was formed the following summer by three members of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad, and Rafiq Jabbar. The IAP, in turn, was established in America to serve as the premier front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. A 1991 internal memorandum charged them, and others, with serving “the Muslim Palestinian cause on the American front in cooperation and coordination with the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) inside America and out of it…”
So much for CAIR being a responsible representative for North American Muslims.
Today, CAIR sends out its lackeys to deny CAIR's Hamas origins. Ahmed Rehab is on record making the ludicrous claim that:
"Nihad Awad and Omar Ahmad have never been members of or associated with or tied to Hamas"
In truth, as the U.S. Department of Justice has stated, there is "a wide array of testimonial and documentary evidence expressly linking CAIR and its founders," Awad and Ahmad, to "the greater HAMAS-affiliated conspiracy" in the United States. CAIR's Corey Saylor recently attempted to intimidate Rep. Sue Myrick because she and other members circulated a memo to Congress warning members about meeting with CAIR after being exposed with ties to Hamas. Saylor's sophomoric letter to Rep. Myrick displayed the usual CAIR denials and used the pathetic victim of Islamophobia and benign civil rights group mantra that has long been discredited by the counterterrorism community.
The truth is clear. CAIR is a front group created for Hamas.
CAIR, standing with Hamas, condemns Israel for every defensive act the Jewish state rightfully engages in to defend itself, yet says absolutely nothing about Hamas using innocent children as props in Hamas “terrorist pornography”.
Hamas MP Fathi Hammad is on record boasting of using “human shields” in the recent conflict with Israeli Defense Force (IDF) troops.
Hammad, in a television broadcast, spoke of how the "enemies" of Allah:
"...do not know that the Palestinian people has developed its [methods] of death and
death-seeking. For the Palestinian people, death has become an industry, at which
women excel, and so do all the people living on this land ...The elderly excel at this,
and so do the mujahideen and the children. This is why they have formed human
shields of the women, the children, the elderly, and the mujahideen, in order to
challenge the Zionist bombing machine... It is as if they were saying to the
Zionest enemy: 'We desire death like you desire life.'"
There you have it. In the words of a top Hamas member in a public broadcast, children, elderly, and women “excel” at dying for Islamist ideology; an ideology that is in complete accord with Adolph Hitler’s philosophy of using people to achieve an end. What kind of people use their own children, women, and elderly as sacrifices to satisfy the blood-lust of religious zealots who profane “Allah” with their very breaths?
This is the Palestinian side of the conflict that CAIR will never reveal.
We of the West suffered a humiliating lesson at Munich when the “free world” sold out Czechoslovakia in order to achieve “Peace in our time” and avert World War II. Apparently, we haven’t been paying attention…but the Islamists have.
They know something we don’t…they can win by not losing.
We don’t have that option ...
lundi 16 février 2009
samedi 14 février 2009
Deux poids, deux mesures, comme d'habitude !
Merci au site de Bivouac pour cette caricature ( qui en fait n'en est même pas une )
Interview de Geert Wilders à la BBC
GEERT WILDERS: THE SPEECH HE DIDN'T GIVE "Freedom must prevail"
Here is the full text of the speech Geert Wilders would have given had he not been the victim of the fall of Britain to Islamic supremacism, and had been permitted to speak at the invitation at Lord Pearson at the House of Lords yesterday. Please read it. It is ironic in light of the events of yesterday. Mr. Wilders' eloquence and plain spoken brilliance will change the course of human history. And if they are not heard and his warnings not heeded, we are doomed, my friends. Doomed. The motherland is limping to oblivion.
If the world had not gone insane, this would have been on the front page of every major newspaper the world over.
Audio of a BBC interview that Geert Wilders gave by telephone while he was being detained at Heathrow Airport. A"very sad day" for UK democracy, indeed.
GEERT WILDERS SPEECH IN HOUSE OF LORDS IF HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM
London, Feb. 12, 2009
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much.
Thank you for inviting me. Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for showing Fitna, and for your gracious invitation. While others look away, you, seem to understand the true tradition of your country, and a flag that still stands for freedom.
This is no ordinary place. This is not just one of England’s tourist attractions. This is a sacred place. This is the mother of all Parliaments, and I am deeply humbled to speak before you.
The Houses of Parliament is where Winston Churchill stood firm, and warned – all throughout the 1930’s – for the dangers looming. Most of the time he stood alone.
In 1982 President Reagan came to the House of Commons, where he did a speech very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly.
What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.
Communism was indeed left on the ash heap of history, just as Reagan predicted in his speech in the House of Commons. He lived to see the Berlin Wall coming down, just as Churchill witnessed the implosion of national-socialism.
Today, I come before you to warn of another great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, the end of democracy. It is not a religion, it is a political ideology. It demands you respect, but has no respect for you.
There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is build on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never go away. First, there is Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect.
Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. The question is whether the British people, with its glorious past, is longing for that submission.
We see Islam taking off in the West at an incredible speed. The United Kingdom has seen a rapid growth of the number of Muslims. Over the last ten years, the Muslim population has grown ten times as fast as the rest of society. This has put an enormous pressure on society. Thanks to British politicians who have forgotten about Winston Churchill, the English now have taken the path of least resistance. They give up. They give in.
Thank you very much for letting me into the country. I received a letter from the Secretary of State for the Home Department, kindly disinviting me. I would threaten community relations, and therefore public security in the UK, the letter stated.
For a moment I feared that I would be refused entrance. But I was confident the British government would never sacrifice free speech because of fear of Islam. Britannia rules the waves, and Islam will never rule Britain, so I was confident the Border Agency would let me through. And after all, you have invited stranger creatures than me. Two years ago the House of Commons welcomed Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh, linked to Al Qaeda. He was invited to Westminster by Lord Ahmed, who met him at Regent’s Park mosque three weeks before. Mr. Rideh, suspected of being a money man for terror groups, was given a SECURITY sticker for his Parliamentary visit.
Well, if you let in this man, than an elected politician from a fellow EU country surely is welcome here too. By letting me speak today you show that Mr Churchill’s spirit is still very much alive. And you prove that the European Union truly is working; the free movement of persons is still one of the pillars of the European project.
But there is still much work to be done. Britain seems to have become a country ruled by fear. A country where civil servants cancel Christmas celebrations to please Muslims. A country where Sharia Courts are part of the legal system. A country where Islamic organizations asked to stop the commemoration of the Holocaust. A country where a primary school cancels a Christmas nativity play because it interfered with an Islamic festival. A country where a school removes the words Christmas and Easter from their calendar so as not to offend Muslims. A country where a teacher punishes two students for refusing to pray to Allah as part of their religious education class. A country where elected members of a town council are told not to eat during daylight hours in town hall meetings during the Ramadan. A country that excels in its hatred of Israel, still the only democracy in the Middle-East. A country whose capitol is becoming ‘Londonistan’.
I would not qualify myself as a free man. Four and a half years ago I lost my freedom. I am under guard permanently, courtesy to those who prefer violence to debate. But for the leftist fan club of islam, that is not enough. They started a legal procedure against me. Three weeks ago the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered my criminal prosecution for making ‘Fitna’ and for my views on Islam. I committed what George Orwell called a ‘thought crime’.
You might have seen my name on Fitna’s credit role, but I am not really responsible for that movie. It was made for me. It was actually produced by Muslim extremists, the Quran and Islam itself. If Fitna is considered ‘hate speech’, then how would the Court qualify the Quran, with all it’s calls for violence, and hatred against women and Jews?
Mr. Churchill himself compared the Quran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Well, I did exactly the same, and that is what they are prosecuting me for.
I wonder if the UK ever put Mr. Churchill on trial.
The Court’s decision and the letter I received form the Secretary of State for the Home Department are two major victories for all those who detest freedom of speech. They are doing Islam’s dirty work. Sharia by proxy. The differences between Saudi-Arabia and Jordan on one hand and Holland and Britain are blurring. Europe is now on the fast track of becoming Eurabia. That is apparently the price we have to pay for the project of mass immigration, and the multicultural project.
Ladies and gentlemen, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack. In Europe, freedom of speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural component of our existence is now something we again have to fight for. That is what is at stake. Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue. The question is: Will free speech be put behind bars?
We have to defend freedom of speech.
For the generation of my parents the word ‘London’ is synonymous with hope and freedom. When my country was occupied by the national-socialists the BBC offered a daily glimpse of hope, in the darkness of Nazi tyranny. Millions of my country men listened to it, illegally. The words ‘This Is London’ were a symbol for a better world coming soon. If only the British and Canadian and American soldiers were here.
What will be transmitted forty years from now? Will it still be ‘This Is London’? Or will it be ‘this is Londonistan’? Will it bring us hope, or will it signal the values of Mecca and Medina? Will Britain offer submission or perseverance? Freedom or slavery?
The choice is ours.
Ladies and gentlemen,
We will never apologize for being free. We will never give in. We will never surrender.
Freedom must prevail, and freedom will prevail.
Thank you very much.
Geert Wilders MP
Chairman, Party for Freedom (PVV)
The Netherlands
Here is the full text of the speech Geert Wilders would have given had he not been the victim of the fall of Britain to Islamic supremacism, and had been permitted to speak at the invitation at Lord Pearson at the House of Lords yesterday. Please read it. It is ironic in light of the events of yesterday. Mr. Wilders' eloquence and plain spoken brilliance will change the course of human history. And if they are not heard and his warnings not heeded, we are doomed, my friends. Doomed. The motherland is limping to oblivion.
If the world had not gone insane, this would have been on the front page of every major newspaper the world over.
Audio of a BBC interview that Geert Wilders gave by telephone while he was being detained at Heathrow Airport. A"very sad day" for UK democracy, indeed.
GEERT WILDERS SPEECH IN HOUSE OF LORDS IF HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM
London, Feb. 12, 2009
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much.
Thank you for inviting me. Thank you Lord Pearson and Lady Cox for showing Fitna, and for your gracious invitation. While others look away, you, seem to understand the true tradition of your country, and a flag that still stands for freedom.
This is no ordinary place. This is not just one of England’s tourist attractions. This is a sacred place. This is the mother of all Parliaments, and I am deeply humbled to speak before you.
The Houses of Parliament is where Winston Churchill stood firm, and warned – all throughout the 1930’s – for the dangers looming. Most of the time he stood alone.
In 1982 President Reagan came to the House of Commons, where he did a speech very few people liked. Reagan called upon the West to reject communism and defend freedom. He introduced a phrase: ‘evil empire’. Reagan’s speech stands out as a clarion call to preserve our liberties. I quote: If history teaches anything, it teaches self-delusion in the face of unpleasant facts is folly.
What Reagan meant is that you cannot run away from history, you cannot escape the dangers of ideologies that are out to destroy you. Denial is no option.
Communism was indeed left on the ash heap of history, just as Reagan predicted in his speech in the House of Commons. He lived to see the Berlin Wall coming down, just as Churchill witnessed the implosion of national-socialism.
Today, I come before you to warn of another great threat. It is called Islam. It poses as a religion, but its goals are very worldly: world domination, holy war, sharia law, the end of the separation of church and state, the end of democracy. It is not a religion, it is a political ideology. It demands you respect, but has no respect for you.
There might be moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. Islam will never change, because it is build on two rocks that are forever, two fundamental beliefs that will never change, and will never go away. First, there is Quran, Allah’s personal word, uncreated, forever, with orders that need to be fulfilled regardless of place or time. And second, there is al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man, Muhammad the role model, whose deeds are to be imitated by all Muslims. And since Muhammad was a warlord and a conqueror we know what to expect.
Islam means submission, so there cannot be any mistake about it’s goal. That’s a given. The question is whether the British people, with its glorious past, is longing for that submission.
We see Islam taking off in the West at an incredible speed. The United Kingdom has seen a rapid growth of the number of Muslims. Over the last ten years, the Muslim population has grown ten times as fast as the rest of society. This has put an enormous pressure on society. Thanks to British politicians who have forgotten about Winston Churchill, the English now have taken the path of least resistance. They give up. They give in.
Thank you very much for letting me into the country. I received a letter from the Secretary of State for the Home Department, kindly disinviting me. I would threaten community relations, and therefore public security in the UK, the letter stated.
For a moment I feared that I would be refused entrance. But I was confident the British government would never sacrifice free speech because of fear of Islam. Britannia rules the waves, and Islam will never rule Britain, so I was confident the Border Agency would let me through. And after all, you have invited stranger creatures than me. Two years ago the House of Commons welcomed Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh, linked to Al Qaeda. He was invited to Westminster by Lord Ahmed, who met him at Regent’s Park mosque three weeks before. Mr. Rideh, suspected of being a money man for terror groups, was given a SECURITY sticker for his Parliamentary visit.
Well, if you let in this man, than an elected politician from a fellow EU country surely is welcome here too. By letting me speak today you show that Mr Churchill’s spirit is still very much alive. And you prove that the European Union truly is working; the free movement of persons is still one of the pillars of the European project.
But there is still much work to be done. Britain seems to have become a country ruled by fear. A country where civil servants cancel Christmas celebrations to please Muslims. A country where Sharia Courts are part of the legal system. A country where Islamic organizations asked to stop the commemoration of the Holocaust. A country where a primary school cancels a Christmas nativity play because it interfered with an Islamic festival. A country where a school removes the words Christmas and Easter from their calendar so as not to offend Muslims. A country where a teacher punishes two students for refusing to pray to Allah as part of their religious education class. A country where elected members of a town council are told not to eat during daylight hours in town hall meetings during the Ramadan. A country that excels in its hatred of Israel, still the only democracy in the Middle-East. A country whose capitol is becoming ‘Londonistan’.
I would not qualify myself as a free man. Four and a half years ago I lost my freedom. I am under guard permanently, courtesy to those who prefer violence to debate. But for the leftist fan club of islam, that is not enough. They started a legal procedure against me. Three weeks ago the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered my criminal prosecution for making ‘Fitna’ and for my views on Islam. I committed what George Orwell called a ‘thought crime’.
You might have seen my name on Fitna’s credit role, but I am not really responsible for that movie. It was made for me. It was actually produced by Muslim extremists, the Quran and Islam itself. If Fitna is considered ‘hate speech’, then how would the Court qualify the Quran, with all it’s calls for violence, and hatred against women and Jews?
Mr. Churchill himself compared the Quran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Well, I did exactly the same, and that is what they are prosecuting me for.
I wonder if the UK ever put Mr. Churchill on trial.
The Court’s decision and the letter I received form the Secretary of State for the Home Department are two major victories for all those who detest freedom of speech. They are doing Islam’s dirty work. Sharia by proxy. The differences between Saudi-Arabia and Jordan on one hand and Holland and Britain are blurring. Europe is now on the fast track of becoming Eurabia. That is apparently the price we have to pay for the project of mass immigration, and the multicultural project.
Ladies and gentlemen, the dearest of our many freedoms is under attack. In Europe, freedom of speech is no longer a given. What we once considered a natural component of our existence is now something we again have to fight for. That is what is at stake. Whether or not I end up in jail is not the most pressing issue. The question is: Will free speech be put behind bars?
We have to defend freedom of speech.
For the generation of my parents the word ‘London’ is synonymous with hope and freedom. When my country was occupied by the national-socialists the BBC offered a daily glimpse of hope, in the darkness of Nazi tyranny. Millions of my country men listened to it, illegally. The words ‘This Is London’ were a symbol for a better world coming soon. If only the British and Canadian and American soldiers were here.
What will be transmitted forty years from now? Will it still be ‘This Is London’? Or will it be ‘this is Londonistan’? Will it bring us hope, or will it signal the values of Mecca and Medina? Will Britain offer submission or perseverance? Freedom or slavery?
The choice is ours.
Ladies and gentlemen,
We will never apologize for being free. We will never give in. We will never surrender.
Freedom must prevail, and freedom will prevail.
Thank you very much.
Geert Wilders MP
Chairman, Party for Freedom (PVV)
The Netherlands
Un leader musulman " modéré " assassine modérément son épouse
A NY Muslim leader has pulled a Mohammad and beheaded his wife. Mr. Hassan was a community leader and a so called "moderate" Muslim. He was the founder of Bridges TV. A show started to help combat the negative perceptions of Islam and also to build bridges to the non-Muslim world. Does that include beheadings?
Hat tip to JihadWatch
Prominent Orchard Park man charged with beheading his wife
By Gene Warner
NEWS STAFF REPORTER
Orchard Park police are investigating a particularly gruesome killing, the beheading of a woman, after her husband -- an influential member of the local Muslim community -- reported her death to police Thursday.
Police identified the victim as Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37. Detectives have charged her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, with second-degree murder.
"He came to the police station at 6:20 p.m. [Thursday] and told us that she was dead," Orchard Park Police Chief Andrew Benz said late this morning.
Muzzammil Hassan told police that his wife was at his business, Bridges TV, on Thorn Avenue in the village. Officers went to that location and discovered her body.
Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.
The killing apparently occurred some time late Thursday afternoon. Detectives still are looking for the murder weapon.
"Obviously, this is the worst form of domestic violence possible," Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III said today.
Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband.
"She had an order of protection that had him out of the home as of Friday the 6th [of February]," Benz said.
Muzzammil Hassan was arraigned before Village Justice Deborah Chimes and sent to the Erie County Holding Center.
Hat tip to JihadWatch
Prominent Orchard Park man charged with beheading his wife
By Gene Warner
NEWS STAFF REPORTER
Orchard Park police are investigating a particularly gruesome killing, the beheading of a woman, after her husband -- an influential member of the local Muslim community -- reported her death to police Thursday.
Police identified the victim as Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37. Detectives have charged her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, with second-degree murder.
"He came to the police station at 6:20 p.m. [Thursday] and told us that she was dead," Orchard Park Police Chief Andrew Benz said late this morning.
Muzzammil Hassan told police that his wife was at his business, Bridges TV, on Thorn Avenue in the village. Officers went to that location and discovered her body.
Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.
The killing apparently occurred some time late Thursday afternoon. Detectives still are looking for the murder weapon.
"Obviously, this is the worst form of domestic violence possible," Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III said today.
Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband.
"She had an order of protection that had him out of the home as of Friday the 6th [of February]," Benz said.
Muzzammil Hassan was arraigned before Village Justice Deborah Chimes and sent to the Erie County Holding Center.
vendredi 13 février 2009
Honte au gouvernement britannique, qui se couche devant les islamistes, en expulsant Geert Wilders !
Editorial de Riposte Laïque
Ce qui vient de se passer en Grande-Bretagne est tellement significatif de la lâcheté des gouvernements occidentaux qu’on ne sait si on doit pleurer, ou éclater de rire ! Rappelons les faits.
Un membre de la Chambre des Lords avait l’intention d’inviter ses collègues à une réunion privée dans une salle de conférence de la Chambre des Lords pour rencontrer Geert Wilders, un député du Parlement néerlandais, afin de regarder son film controversé Fitna (1), puis d’en discuter avec lui.
A peine l’invitation avait-elle été envoyée à tous les membres de la Chambre, que Lord Ahmed soulevait une tempête (2). Il s’est dit prêt à mobiliser 10.000 musulmans pour empêcher M. Wilders de pénétrer dans la Chambre, et a menacé de poursuivre devant les tribunaux la collègue qui avait organisé l’événement. Le résultat est que l’événement, qui devait avoir lieu ce jeudi, a été annulé, dans un premier temps.
Qui est ce lord Ahmed ? Il est originaire du Pakistan, et est le premier élu musulman à siéger à la Chambre des Lords. Il a été l’un des fondateurs du Forum mondial, une organisation vouée à « la promotion de la paix dans le monde au lendemain du 11 septembre, en jetant des ponts entre le monde musulman et l’Occident par la relance d’une tradition de dialogue entre les peuples, les cultures et les civilisations fondée sur la tolérance ».
Au vu des attentats de Londres, le message n’a pas dû être compris par tout le monde !
Là où cela devient cocasse, c’est que Geert Wilders a quand même décidé de répondre à l’invitation de son collègue britannique. C’est alors que le gouvernement travailliste, celui qui accepte depuis des années toutes les revendications communautaristes musulmanes, qui reconnaît les tribunaux islamistes (3), a décidé d’abord de l’arrêter, et de le faire reconduire manu militari dans son pays (4).
En Grande-Bretagne, les islamistes ont donc le droit de multiplier les appels au meurtre contre tous ceux qui ne sont pas musulmans, les appels au jihad, les prêches haineuses dans les mosquées (5). Par contre, un élu n’a pas le droit d’inviter un député hollandais au Parlement, pour diffuser et commenter un film qui critique l’islam !
Il y a une semaine, notre journal s’indignait, nouveau recul, que des policières anglaises puissent porter le voile islamique (6).
Nous espérons que le talentueux et très irrespectueux Pat Condell (7) dénoncera, avec ses mots à lui, ce nouveau recul honteux montrant jusqu’ou un gouvernement travailliste est capable d’aller, dans la capitulation, pour ne pas froisser les musulmans.
Rappelons que cette gauche britannique donnait des leçons à la France, lors de sa loi contre les signes religieux à l’école, en 2004, considérant notre pays comme liberticide. L’ancien maire de Londres, Ken Livingstone, avait comparé cette loi aux mesures prises contre les Juifs, lors de la période de Vichy (8).
Dans un pays européen, on expulse donc Geert Wilders, mais on accepte sans problème que Hani Ramadan, celui qui justifie la lapidation des femmes, et explique que le sida est une punition divine, vienne prêcher pour l’application de la charia, dans toute l’Europe.
Rappelons cette célèbre phrase de Winston Churchill, au lendemain de Munich, à l’encontre de Daladier et de Lord Chamberlain : "Vous avez voulu éviter la guerre au prix du déshonneur. Vous aurez le déshonneur et vous aurez la guerre".
Le dernier numéro de la "Raison Militante", journal de l’ADLPF, rappelle cette interview de Taslima Nasreen, en 2002, au Nouvel Observateur : "Il faut critiquer l’islam, c’est un acte utile pour ceux qui vivent dans ces pays. Sous l’islam, ni la démocratie, ni les droits de l’Homme, ni les droits de la femme, ni la liberté d’expression ne peuvent survivre. Ce dont les pays islamiques ont le plus besoin, c’est d’introduire la laïcité, d’abolir d’urgence les lois islamiques pour sauver les femmes. Si vous voulez réellement du bien aux pays islamiques, vous devez combattre l’islam". N’en déplaise aux bien-pensants laïques, Taslima, comme Ayaan Hirsi Ali, comme Geert Wilders, ne fait pas la différence entre islam et islamisme. Pourtant, les deux premières sont adorées par le camp laïque, l’autre est insulté !
En capitulant devant les islamistes, les gouvernements français, anglais, hollandais, norvégiens, suédois, et bien d’autres, trahissent les idéaux universalistes. Les laïques qui salissent Wilders, et s’en désolidarisent, ne comprennent-ils pas que les enjeux sont les mêmes que lors de l’affaire des caricatures : liberté d’expression contre fascisme islamiste, Lumières contre obscurantisme ?
Nous ne pouvons compter que sur la réaction des peuples, pour défendre des valeurs qui ne se négocient pas : la liberté de conscience, l’égalité hommes-femmes, la libre critique de tous les dogmes.
Tout ce que l’islam ne peut accepter.
Cyrano
(1) http://pointdebasculecanada.ca/spip.php/IMG/pdf/local/cache-vignettes/L297xH270/IMG/pdf/spip.php ?article338
(2) http://kabyles.net/+Lord-Ahmed-contre-Geert-Wilders+.html
(3) http://www.bivouac-id.com/2009/02/12/alerte-le-depute-neerlandais-wilders-arrete-a-londres-va-etre-renvoye-aux-pays-bas/
(4) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Campagne-contre-les-tribunaux-de.html
(5) http://video.google.com/videoplay ?docid=2668560761490749816
(6) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Les-policieres-anglaises.html
(7) http://www.bivouac-id.com/2008/10/07/exclusif-bivouac-la-video-censuree-de-pat-condell-en-version-francaise-%C2%AB-bienvenue-en-grande-bretagne-saoudite-%C2%BB/
(8) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Pourquoi-je-me-rejouis-de-la.html
Ce qui vient de se passer en Grande-Bretagne est tellement significatif de la lâcheté des gouvernements occidentaux qu’on ne sait si on doit pleurer, ou éclater de rire ! Rappelons les faits.
Un membre de la Chambre des Lords avait l’intention d’inviter ses collègues à une réunion privée dans une salle de conférence de la Chambre des Lords pour rencontrer Geert Wilders, un député du Parlement néerlandais, afin de regarder son film controversé Fitna (1), puis d’en discuter avec lui.
A peine l’invitation avait-elle été envoyée à tous les membres de la Chambre, que Lord Ahmed soulevait une tempête (2). Il s’est dit prêt à mobiliser 10.000 musulmans pour empêcher M. Wilders de pénétrer dans la Chambre, et a menacé de poursuivre devant les tribunaux la collègue qui avait organisé l’événement. Le résultat est que l’événement, qui devait avoir lieu ce jeudi, a été annulé, dans un premier temps.
Qui est ce lord Ahmed ? Il est originaire du Pakistan, et est le premier élu musulman à siéger à la Chambre des Lords. Il a été l’un des fondateurs du Forum mondial, une organisation vouée à « la promotion de la paix dans le monde au lendemain du 11 septembre, en jetant des ponts entre le monde musulman et l’Occident par la relance d’une tradition de dialogue entre les peuples, les cultures et les civilisations fondée sur la tolérance ».
Au vu des attentats de Londres, le message n’a pas dû être compris par tout le monde !
Là où cela devient cocasse, c’est que Geert Wilders a quand même décidé de répondre à l’invitation de son collègue britannique. C’est alors que le gouvernement travailliste, celui qui accepte depuis des années toutes les revendications communautaristes musulmanes, qui reconnaît les tribunaux islamistes (3), a décidé d’abord de l’arrêter, et de le faire reconduire manu militari dans son pays (4).
En Grande-Bretagne, les islamistes ont donc le droit de multiplier les appels au meurtre contre tous ceux qui ne sont pas musulmans, les appels au jihad, les prêches haineuses dans les mosquées (5). Par contre, un élu n’a pas le droit d’inviter un député hollandais au Parlement, pour diffuser et commenter un film qui critique l’islam !
Il y a une semaine, notre journal s’indignait, nouveau recul, que des policières anglaises puissent porter le voile islamique (6).
Nous espérons que le talentueux et très irrespectueux Pat Condell (7) dénoncera, avec ses mots à lui, ce nouveau recul honteux montrant jusqu’ou un gouvernement travailliste est capable d’aller, dans la capitulation, pour ne pas froisser les musulmans.
Rappelons que cette gauche britannique donnait des leçons à la France, lors de sa loi contre les signes religieux à l’école, en 2004, considérant notre pays comme liberticide. L’ancien maire de Londres, Ken Livingstone, avait comparé cette loi aux mesures prises contre les Juifs, lors de la période de Vichy (8).
Dans un pays européen, on expulse donc Geert Wilders, mais on accepte sans problème que Hani Ramadan, celui qui justifie la lapidation des femmes, et explique que le sida est une punition divine, vienne prêcher pour l’application de la charia, dans toute l’Europe.
Rappelons cette célèbre phrase de Winston Churchill, au lendemain de Munich, à l’encontre de Daladier et de Lord Chamberlain : "Vous avez voulu éviter la guerre au prix du déshonneur. Vous aurez le déshonneur et vous aurez la guerre".
Le dernier numéro de la "Raison Militante", journal de l’ADLPF, rappelle cette interview de Taslima Nasreen, en 2002, au Nouvel Observateur : "Il faut critiquer l’islam, c’est un acte utile pour ceux qui vivent dans ces pays. Sous l’islam, ni la démocratie, ni les droits de l’Homme, ni les droits de la femme, ni la liberté d’expression ne peuvent survivre. Ce dont les pays islamiques ont le plus besoin, c’est d’introduire la laïcité, d’abolir d’urgence les lois islamiques pour sauver les femmes. Si vous voulez réellement du bien aux pays islamiques, vous devez combattre l’islam". N’en déplaise aux bien-pensants laïques, Taslima, comme Ayaan Hirsi Ali, comme Geert Wilders, ne fait pas la différence entre islam et islamisme. Pourtant, les deux premières sont adorées par le camp laïque, l’autre est insulté !
En capitulant devant les islamistes, les gouvernements français, anglais, hollandais, norvégiens, suédois, et bien d’autres, trahissent les idéaux universalistes. Les laïques qui salissent Wilders, et s’en désolidarisent, ne comprennent-ils pas que les enjeux sont les mêmes que lors de l’affaire des caricatures : liberté d’expression contre fascisme islamiste, Lumières contre obscurantisme ?
Nous ne pouvons compter que sur la réaction des peuples, pour défendre des valeurs qui ne se négocient pas : la liberté de conscience, l’égalité hommes-femmes, la libre critique de tous les dogmes.
Tout ce que l’islam ne peut accepter.
Cyrano
(1) http://pointdebasculecanada.ca/spip.php/IMG/pdf/local/cache-vignettes/L297xH270/IMG/pdf/spip.php ?article338
(2) http://kabyles.net/+Lord-Ahmed-contre-Geert-Wilders+.html
(3) http://www.bivouac-id.com/2009/02/12/alerte-le-depute-neerlandais-wilders-arrete-a-londres-va-etre-renvoye-aux-pays-bas/
(4) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Campagne-contre-les-tribunaux-de.html
(5) http://video.google.com/videoplay ?docid=2668560761490749816
(6) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Les-policieres-anglaises.html
(7) http://www.bivouac-id.com/2008/10/07/exclusif-bivouac-la-video-censuree-de-pat-condell-en-version-francaise-%C2%AB-bienvenue-en-grande-bretagne-saoudite-%C2%BB/
(8) http://www.ripostelaique.com/Pourquoi-je-me-rejouis-de-la.html
Geert Wilders arrêté sur l'ordre du dhimmi Gordon Brown, la carpette des islamistes
Geert Wilders detained at Heathrow Airport
donderdag, 12 februari 2009
Geert Wilders has been denied entry into the United Kingdom. The Freedom Party leader was invited to show his film Fitna in the UK's House of Lords. Upon arrival at Heathrow Airport he was detained and told that he would not be allowed to enter Great Britain. "I am in a detention centre at Heathrow," Wilders told The Times. "They took my passport. I will not be allowed to enter the country. They will send me back within a few hours.”
Wilders has denouced the British Government as "the biggest bunch of cowards in Europe. They are more Chamberlain than Churchill.I was invited by another politician (Lord Pearson of Rannoch). I am a democrat, I am serving freedom of speech. They are not only being nasty to me they are being nasty to freedom of speech."
Wilders has received hundreds of messages of support from Britons who disagree with their governments decision. Polls on the Daily Mail and Guardian websites both show an overwhelming majority of voters opposing the ban.
donderdag, 12 februari 2009
Geert Wilders has been denied entry into the United Kingdom. The Freedom Party leader was invited to show his film Fitna in the UK's House of Lords. Upon arrival at Heathrow Airport he was detained and told that he would not be allowed to enter Great Britain. "I am in a detention centre at Heathrow," Wilders told The Times. "They took my passport. I will not be allowed to enter the country. They will send me back within a few hours.”
Wilders has denouced the British Government as "the biggest bunch of cowards in Europe. They are more Chamberlain than Churchill.I was invited by another politician (Lord Pearson of Rannoch). I am a democrat, I am serving freedom of speech. They are not only being nasty to me they are being nasty to freedom of speech."
Wilders has received hundreds of messages of support from Britons who disagree with their governments decision. Polls on the Daily Mail and Guardian websites both show an overwhelming majority of voters opposing the ban.
Violences mahométanes antisémites en Suède
The DEATH MARCHES WORLDWIDE are getting more violent, more dangerous. Where is the world media? The videos are shocking. But it's Wilders who faces prosecution. Consider that for a moment. Over at Islam in Action:
Sweden:Muslims Shoot Rockets, Hurl Pipebombs at Jews
Back in late January I posted about a pro-Israel rally in Sweden. At the rally the Jewish protesters had eggs and a teargas grenade thrown at them. On Sunday the brave Jews took to the streets one more time. In response the Muslims stepped up their hateful efforts by firing rockets and throwing pipe bombs towards the pro-Israel crowd. Listen to Muslims cheer in the videos as the explosions take place.
Hat tip to Dayag.
Islamists Fire Rockets, Hurl Bombs at Pro-Israel Crowd in Sweden
by Gil Ronen
(IsraelNN.com) Islamists reached new heights of audacity in a face-off with pro-Israel demonstrators in Malmö, Sweden on Sunday, firing rockets and throwing pipe bombs at the pro-Israel group in broad daylight and under police's noses. No one was hurt. The incident was videotaped by Swedish blogger Ted Ekeroth.
Between 400 and 500 people gathered in Stortorget Square for a peaceful pro-Israeli protest.
The police sealed off the entire square and only allowed in the protesters, as well as a smaller group of Islamists, and separated the two groups from each other.
Blogger Ekeroth wrote: "It didn't take long until they started attacking us, this time with homemade pipebombs and fireworks. The homemade bombs were pretty powerful, as I stood not too far away when one of them exploded. According to what I heard, the police managed to arrest the ones that threw the bombs. However, they did not disperse the Arab crowd…"
In total, Ekeroth reported, the Islamists threw two pipe bombs, fired two rockets and hurled some glass bottles. The bombs did not reach the pro-Israel protesters but the rockets exploded over their heads.
The largest newspaper in the south, Sydsvenskan, chose to "distort and bend the truth," Ekeroth reported. The news item about the confrontation was headlined “Several arrested during Israel demonstration” and, amazingly, reported that "The expected violence did not occur."
Sweden:Muslims Shoot Rockets, Hurl Pipebombs at Jews
Back in late January I posted about a pro-Israel rally in Sweden. At the rally the Jewish protesters had eggs and a teargas grenade thrown at them. On Sunday the brave Jews took to the streets one more time. In response the Muslims stepped up their hateful efforts by firing rockets and throwing pipe bombs towards the pro-Israel crowd. Listen to Muslims cheer in the videos as the explosions take place.
Hat tip to Dayag.
Islamists Fire Rockets, Hurl Bombs at Pro-Israel Crowd in Sweden
by Gil Ronen
(IsraelNN.com) Islamists reached new heights of audacity in a face-off with pro-Israel demonstrators in Malmö, Sweden on Sunday, firing rockets and throwing pipe bombs at the pro-Israel group in broad daylight and under police's noses. No one was hurt. The incident was videotaped by Swedish blogger Ted Ekeroth.
Between 400 and 500 people gathered in Stortorget Square for a peaceful pro-Israeli protest.
The police sealed off the entire square and only allowed in the protesters, as well as a smaller group of Islamists, and separated the two groups from each other.
Blogger Ekeroth wrote: "It didn't take long until they started attacking us, this time with homemade pipebombs and fireworks. The homemade bombs were pretty powerful, as I stood not too far away when one of them exploded. According to what I heard, the police managed to arrest the ones that threw the bombs. However, they did not disperse the Arab crowd…"
In total, Ekeroth reported, the Islamists threw two pipe bombs, fired two rockets and hurled some glass bottles. The bombs did not reach the pro-Israel protesters but the rockets exploded over their heads.
The largest newspaper in the south, Sydsvenskan, chose to "distort and bend the truth," Ekeroth reported. The news item about the confrontation was headlined “Several arrested during Israel demonstration” and, amazingly, reported that "The expected violence did not occur."
L'antisémitisme mahométan, encore et toujours !
Federal agents executed a search warrant this morning at a North Side apartment building in connection with last month's vandalism at four synagogues and Jewish schools in Chicago and Lincolnwood.
The FBI's search warrant was related to a former New York resident who police believe is connected to the vandalism as well as written threats against Jewish institutions, a law-enforcement source said.
FBI agents were searching an apartment in the 6000 block of North Artesian Avenue. No arrests have been reported. A computer hard drive and a laptop computer were seen being taken out of the building. Agents also seized a Chevrolet van and a Nissan sport-utility vehicle.(more here)
News accounts leave out the names - when its a Muslim. Always. These attacks on Jews by Muslims here, there, everywhere -- are the legacy of Islamic anti-semitism. Jew hatred is in their religion - Iran, Gaza, Paris, London, Chicago ........... it manifests itself everywhere there are Muslims. Until they undergo a Vatican 2 -- Jews will never be safe.
Debbie Schlussel has the back story on suspects in those terrible attacks on five Chicago are synagogues. Read it all here:
At the beginning of the year, I related news of violent attacks on five Chicago-area synagogues, including reader David Makowsky's synagogue, and two Jewish schools. In addition to destructive vandalism, the perpetrators--whom I surmised (and now am proven correct, yet again) were Muslim--scrawled anti-Semitic graffiti, wishing death to the Jews and Israel all over the buildings they attacked. (It hits close to home. One of the schools, Ida Crown Jewish Academy, is my little sister's alma mater, and the principal, Rabbi Lenny Matanky, was a counselor at my summer camp.)
This morning, FBI agents raided a Chicago-area home (in West Rogers Park--a highly Jewish area) in connection with these hate crimes.
The FBI's search warrant was related to a former New York resident who police believe is connected to the vandalism as well as written threats against Jewish institutions, a law-enforcement source said.
FBI agents were searching an apartment in the 6000 block of North Artesian Avenue. No arrests have been reported. A computer hard drive and a laptop computer were seen being taken out of the building. Agents also seized a Chevrolet van and a Nissan sport-utility vehicle.(more here)
News accounts leave out the names - when its a Muslim. Always. These attacks on Jews by Muslims here, there, everywhere -- are the legacy of Islamic anti-semitism. Jew hatred is in their religion - Iran, Gaza, Paris, London, Chicago ........... it manifests itself everywhere there are Muslims. Until they undergo a Vatican 2 -- Jews will never be safe.
Debbie Schlussel has the back story on suspects in those terrible attacks on five Chicago are synagogues. Read it all here:
At the beginning of the year, I related news of violent attacks on five Chicago-area synagogues, including reader David Makowsky's synagogue, and two Jewish schools. In addition to destructive vandalism, the perpetrators--whom I surmised (and now am proven correct, yet again) were Muslim--scrawled anti-Semitic graffiti, wishing death to the Jews and Israel all over the buildings they attacked. (It hits close to home. One of the schools, Ida Crown Jewish Academy, is my little sister's alma mater, and the principal, Rabbi Lenny Matanky, was a counselor at my summer camp.)
This morning, FBI agents raided a Chicago-area home (in West Rogers Park--a highly Jewish area) in connection with these hate crimes.
mardi 10 février 2009
L'entrisme mahométan dans les écoles publiques de Grande-Bretagne
UK:Muslims Push for Islam in Public Schools
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 05:09 PM CST
Just a few hours ago I posted about how faith based segregation is taking place in a school assembly in the UK because of the demands of Muslims. We saw how a headteacher was labeled a "racist" for speaking out against the separation. Now we have another UK teacher who is complaining that Muslim school governors are trying to force Islam into the public school curriculum.
£100,000 BATTLE OF HEAD WHO STOOD UP TO 'MUSLIM BULLIES'
Headteacher Erica Connor
6th February 2009 By Tom Hutchinson
AN angry headteacher is suing “gutless” education chiefs for £100,000 for not backing her against Muslim school “bullies”.
Erica Connor claims her bosses did nothing as a group of Muslim governors tried to force her to change the school curriculum.
She also says she was “harassed” by the four-strong team as they demanded the pupils be taught more about Allah and Islam.
And they tried to “railroad” her into linking up with the local mosque and focusing on Muslim worship, says the 57-year-old head, who has taken her fight to London’s High Court.
Erica is suing Surrey education bosses for “turning their back” on her as Muslim rivals branded her “racist and Islamophobic”.
She said she felt under personal attack when investigating bosses branded her “unresponsive to the needs of the faith community”, adding: “This was racism towards me. I felt that, had I been a Muslim head, things would have been conducted in a different way.
“I felt that they didn’t have the courage to stand by me in this.”
Erica, who says she is so depressed she may never work again, reckons bosses should have done a lot more to protect her and New Monument School.
The mum-of-one said her troubles began in 2003 when four Muslim governors were appointed, including convert Paul Martin and Mumtaz Saleem.
They took control of reg-ular meetings, repeatedly demanding more formal Islamic worship in the predominantly Muslim school and closer ties with the nearby mosque in Woking.
When she fought back, Mr Martin claimed the ethos of the school was racist and alleged she believed Pakistanis were “less intelligent”.
An investigation later found she “had not been responsive to the needs of the faith community”.
Erica told Judge John Leighton Williams QC she was “horrified” by the conclusion, which she believes made her “a helpless scapegoat”.
Council lawyers are fighting her claim for damages.
The hearing continues.
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 05:09 PM CST
Just a few hours ago I posted about how faith based segregation is taking place in a school assembly in the UK because of the demands of Muslims. We saw how a headteacher was labeled a "racist" for speaking out against the separation. Now we have another UK teacher who is complaining that Muslim school governors are trying to force Islam into the public school curriculum.
£100,000 BATTLE OF HEAD WHO STOOD UP TO 'MUSLIM BULLIES'
Headteacher Erica Connor
6th February 2009 By Tom Hutchinson
AN angry headteacher is suing “gutless” education chiefs for £100,000 for not backing her against Muslim school “bullies”.
Erica Connor claims her bosses did nothing as a group of Muslim governors tried to force her to change the school curriculum.
She also says she was “harassed” by the four-strong team as they demanded the pupils be taught more about Allah and Islam.
And they tried to “railroad” her into linking up with the local mosque and focusing on Muslim worship, says the 57-year-old head, who has taken her fight to London’s High Court.
Erica is suing Surrey education bosses for “turning their back” on her as Muslim rivals branded her “racist and Islamophobic”.
She said she felt under personal attack when investigating bosses branded her “unresponsive to the needs of the faith community”, adding: “This was racism towards me. I felt that, had I been a Muslim head, things would have been conducted in a different way.
“I felt that they didn’t have the courage to stand by me in this.”
Erica, who says she is so depressed she may never work again, reckons bosses should have done a lot more to protect her and New Monument School.
The mum-of-one said her troubles began in 2003 when four Muslim governors were appointed, including convert Paul Martin and Mumtaz Saleem.
They took control of reg-ular meetings, repeatedly demanding more formal Islamic worship in the predominantly Muslim school and closer ties with the nearby mosque in Woking.
When she fought back, Mr Martin claimed the ethos of the school was racist and alleged she believed Pakistanis were “less intelligent”.
An investigation later found she “had not been responsive to the needs of the faith community”.
Erica told Judge John Leighton Williams QC she was “horrified” by the conclusion, which she believes made her “a helpless scapegoat”.
Council lawyers are fighting her claim for damages.
The hearing continues.
Encore une avancée de la dhimmitude en Grande-Bretagne
UK:Islamic Segregation OK
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 01:01 PM CST
A headteacher in the UK has been forced to resign after she tried to do away with faith based segregation in school assemblies. The headteacher was actually labeled a "racist" because she want children of all faiths to be in the assembly together. The world is officially upside down now.
Headteacher forced to resign after being branded racist for trying to axe separate assemblies for Muslims
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
09th February 2009
A primary school headteacher has resigned after Muslim parents protested over plans to scrap separate faith assemblies for their children.
Soon after taking over at the school Julia Robinson told staff she wanted to hold assemblies for all pupils, which would encompass all faiths.
The practise is common in most schools and after taking advice from the local authority, Ms Robinson set up a working party to look at alternatives.
But their work was stopped after a number of parents at Meersbrook Bank Primary Community in Sheffield complained about the plans.
Mrs Robinson was accused of being racist and following the complaints she was away from her post for most of last year.
She was due to make a phased return to her duties this term. But again there were protests from some parents when they heard she would be coming back.
Mrs Robinson resigned from her job and the school's chair of governors Sarah Browton also quit in support.
A member of staff who asked not to be named said: 'The headteacher inherited the separate assemblies when she started the job and she took careful advice from the authority on what to do about them.
'But when she tried to stop them, feeling they did nothing to promote inclusiveness, she was accused of being a racist.
'She wanted to hold assemblies for all the pupils, which would include all faiths. That is what happens in most schools but some parents wanted things to stay as they were.
'Mrs Robinson was under a lot of pressure and wasn't at school for some time. The plan was for her to come back but again some of the parents put a stop to that.
'Many of us here just feel this is all very wrong. Everyone was told that we had to heal and we had to move on.
'There's now an interim head in place and that situation could drag on for some time to come.
The feeling is that Julia was doing the right thing and went through all the right routes as to what she was trying to do.
'The aim was for inclusion there's no other school we know that has separate assemblies like these.
'The buzzword from the authority at the moment is all about community cohesion but there is little cohesion at this school. The staff are very upset at what has happened.'
A Sheffield Council spokeswoman said: 'We can confirm that the headteacher of Meersbrook Bank Primary School has tendered her resignation for her post which has been accepted.
'Parents have been made aware of the matter and temporary arrangements are in place until a new headteacher is appointed.'
Acting chair of governors Rob Stephens added: 'We would like to thank her for her work at the school, and wish her well for the future.
'Mrs Pamela Smith has been appointed as the lead teacher.'
After taking over at Meersbrook Mrs Robinson outlined her plans for the future for the 115 year old school on its website.
On it she said : 'We have launched the new school year by reviewing and rewriting our school vision and aims. We pride ourselves on the diversity of our community and our family feel.'
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 01:01 PM CST
A headteacher in the UK has been forced to resign after she tried to do away with faith based segregation in school assemblies. The headteacher was actually labeled a "racist" because she want children of all faiths to be in the assembly together. The world is officially upside down now.
Headteacher forced to resign after being branded racist for trying to axe separate assemblies for Muslims
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
09th February 2009
A primary school headteacher has resigned after Muslim parents protested over plans to scrap separate faith assemblies for their children.
Soon after taking over at the school Julia Robinson told staff she wanted to hold assemblies for all pupils, which would encompass all faiths.
The practise is common in most schools and after taking advice from the local authority, Ms Robinson set up a working party to look at alternatives.
But their work was stopped after a number of parents at Meersbrook Bank Primary Community in Sheffield complained about the plans.
Mrs Robinson was accused of being racist and following the complaints she was away from her post for most of last year.
She was due to make a phased return to her duties this term. But again there were protests from some parents when they heard she would be coming back.
Mrs Robinson resigned from her job and the school's chair of governors Sarah Browton also quit in support.
A member of staff who asked not to be named said: 'The headteacher inherited the separate assemblies when she started the job and she took careful advice from the authority on what to do about them.
'But when she tried to stop them, feeling they did nothing to promote inclusiveness, she was accused of being a racist.
'She wanted to hold assemblies for all the pupils, which would include all faiths. That is what happens in most schools but some parents wanted things to stay as they were.
'Mrs Robinson was under a lot of pressure and wasn't at school for some time. The plan was for her to come back but again some of the parents put a stop to that.
'Many of us here just feel this is all very wrong. Everyone was told that we had to heal and we had to move on.
'There's now an interim head in place and that situation could drag on for some time to come.
The feeling is that Julia was doing the right thing and went through all the right routes as to what she was trying to do.
'The aim was for inclusion there's no other school we know that has separate assemblies like these.
'The buzzword from the authority at the moment is all about community cohesion but there is little cohesion at this school. The staff are very upset at what has happened.'
A Sheffield Council spokeswoman said: 'We can confirm that the headteacher of Meersbrook Bank Primary School has tendered her resignation for her post which has been accepted.
'Parents have been made aware of the matter and temporary arrangements are in place until a new headteacher is appointed.'
Acting chair of governors Rob Stephens added: 'We would like to thank her for her work at the school, and wish her well for the future.
'Mrs Pamela Smith has been appointed as the lead teacher.'
After taking over at Meersbrook Mrs Robinson outlined her plans for the future for the 115 year old school on its website.
On it she said : 'We have launched the new school year by reviewing and rewriting our school vision and aims. We pride ourselves on the diversity of our community and our family feel.'
Une nouveauté mahométane : le divorce selon la charia par l'intermédiaire de Facebook !
Facebook Being Used for Sharia Divorces
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 10:09 PM CST
Back in December I posted about how Muslims were planning to invade Facebook to spread their propaganda.
Now Muslims have taken it even one step further and are using Facebook for sharia divorces. This all has the approval of sharia lawyers. Is there any aspect of our lives that they are not applying Islam to?
Hat tip to The Religion of Peace
Facebook divorce
By PEARL LEE February 09, 2009
Syariah lawyers said that it’s perfectly all right for a Muslim to divorce their spouse on Facebook or any other social networking website as long as it is in line with hukum syarak (Islamic law) http://www.parlimen.gov.my/billindexbi/pdf/DR%20152005E.pdf.
They were commenting on the curious case of Neil Brady, a 39-year-old Briton who ended his six-year marriage to his wife Emma, 35, and announced it on Facebook last week, making it the first Facebook divorce ever recorded. ( see accompanying story )
Syariah lawyer Muhamad Burok said it does not matter how the declaration of divorce is made as long as it is communicated to the spouse.
“A declaration of divorce among Muslims that follows the hukum syarak is a communication between parties, in this case between a husband and his wife.
“This includes putting down words in writing and sending it to the spouse. It does not matter what medium was used; be it email or SMS; as long as it’s later verified in the (Syariah) court.”
Muhamad also said that the issue of time lapse does not arise in this case. If one makes the declaration of divorce against his spouse today on Facebook and the spouse only learns of it a week later, the effective date is still on the day the posting was made.
Although he has not yet heard of a similar case here, another Syariah lawyer, Zulkifli Che Yong, said: “It is merely a new way of declaring your intentions. In the old days, people used to send letters, telegrams and faxes, but with the advent of technology, it’s becoming easier. It does not matter what medium you use as long as the intent is clear.”
Zulkilfi said that as long as the words used were clear and conclusive (soreh ), then the declaration of divorce accepted. He said another type of declaration is known as kinayah . This is not as clear as the first type of declaration and needs to be coupled with intent and would have to be verified later by the Syariah court.
He also added that the words used must not leave any doubts as to intent, such as “I hereby divorce you with talak satu”.
However, if the statement reads: “I want you out of my house from now on”, then the Syariah court would have to find out what the husband’s intention was at the time he made that statement.
The lawyers also said that it did not matter if the declaration of divorce on Facebook was not made known to a spouse directly as it could also be communicated via a third party.
“A divorce has taken place as soon as the individual finishes writing and as long as there is intent,” Zulkifli added.
Meanwhile, lawyer Surjan Singh said divorce declarations made on Facebook would not apply to non-Muslim couples who will have to get their marriages annulled by the courts.
Neil makes history
Neil Brady, a 39-year-old Briton ended his six-year marriage by making an announcement on Facebook last week – making it the world’s first Facebook divorce.
Foreign news reports had said that Emma Brady, 35, only found out about her husband’s intentions when he changed his Facebook status to read, “Neil Brady has ended his marriage to Emma Brady”. Emma only found out after a friend in Denmark called her up to see how she was coping.
Emma, a mother of one who works as a conference organiser, was shocked by her husband’s actions. This was disclosed during a magistrate’s court hearing in Blackburn at Neil’s sentencing hearing for allegedly assaulting Emma at their home in nearby Accrington.
The Daily Mail had also reported that Emma only joined Facebook because the girls at work said it was good fun.
“What upset me the most was not the fact that Neil had written he had ended our marriage, but the comment from a girl in Canada who said: ‘You are better off out of it’. It hurt me that he had been speaking to someone else about it,” Emma told the Daily Mail .
Emma alleges that even after Neil posted that message, he still didn't tell her for a while that he wanted a divorce.
“He acted like everything was fine, so we carried on as normal,” she said.
Neil Brady said he did tell his wife about wanting to leave her, stating, “I'd had enough of her.”
Neil now lives with his mother.
Recent divorce declarations made via SMS
2006: Singer Noraniza Idris claimed to have a received an SMS from then husband Fauzi Mohd Tajuddin (or better known as Fareez) seeking a divorce.
October 2008: Actor Nasrizal Ngasri, 28, better known as Bell, sent an SMS at 3pm on Oct 22, 2008, to his wife Nur Farhana Mahamad Fauri or Sasha. In it, he had stated: "Aku ceraikan kau (I divorce you). Thank you. Selamat berjaya (All the best)." Bell later stated that the statement was made without malice.
Nov 18, 2008: Renowned painter Raja Azhar Raja Lop Idris sent an SMS divorcing his then wife Charmaine Winifred Idris.
Nov 25, 2008: Dino Rais, son of Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim, divorced his then wife Riza Ainurin Ramlan through an SMS
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 10:09 PM CST
Back in December I posted about how Muslims were planning to invade Facebook to spread their propaganda.
Now Muslims have taken it even one step further and are using Facebook for sharia divorces. This all has the approval of sharia lawyers. Is there any aspect of our lives that they are not applying Islam to?
Hat tip to The Religion of Peace
Facebook divorce
By PEARL LEE February 09, 2009
Syariah lawyers said that it’s perfectly all right for a Muslim to divorce their spouse on Facebook or any other social networking website as long as it is in line with hukum syarak (Islamic law) http://www.parlimen.gov.my/billindexbi/pdf/DR%20152005E.pdf.
They were commenting on the curious case of Neil Brady, a 39-year-old Briton who ended his six-year marriage to his wife Emma, 35, and announced it on Facebook last week, making it the first Facebook divorce ever recorded. ( see accompanying story )
Syariah lawyer Muhamad Burok said it does not matter how the declaration of divorce is made as long as it is communicated to the spouse.
“A declaration of divorce among Muslims that follows the hukum syarak is a communication between parties, in this case between a husband and his wife.
“This includes putting down words in writing and sending it to the spouse. It does not matter what medium was used; be it email or SMS; as long as it’s later verified in the (Syariah) court.”
Muhamad also said that the issue of time lapse does not arise in this case. If one makes the declaration of divorce against his spouse today on Facebook and the spouse only learns of it a week later, the effective date is still on the day the posting was made.
Although he has not yet heard of a similar case here, another Syariah lawyer, Zulkifli Che Yong, said: “It is merely a new way of declaring your intentions. In the old days, people used to send letters, telegrams and faxes, but with the advent of technology, it’s becoming easier. It does not matter what medium you use as long as the intent is clear.”
Zulkilfi said that as long as the words used were clear and conclusive (soreh ), then the declaration of divorce accepted. He said another type of declaration is known as kinayah . This is not as clear as the first type of declaration and needs to be coupled with intent and would have to be verified later by the Syariah court.
He also added that the words used must not leave any doubts as to intent, such as “I hereby divorce you with talak satu”.
However, if the statement reads: “I want you out of my house from now on”, then the Syariah court would have to find out what the husband’s intention was at the time he made that statement.
The lawyers also said that it did not matter if the declaration of divorce on Facebook was not made known to a spouse directly as it could also be communicated via a third party.
“A divorce has taken place as soon as the individual finishes writing and as long as there is intent,” Zulkifli added.
Meanwhile, lawyer Surjan Singh said divorce declarations made on Facebook would not apply to non-Muslim couples who will have to get their marriages annulled by the courts.
Neil makes history
Neil Brady, a 39-year-old Briton ended his six-year marriage by making an announcement on Facebook last week – making it the world’s first Facebook divorce.
Foreign news reports had said that Emma Brady, 35, only found out about her husband’s intentions when he changed his Facebook status to read, “Neil Brady has ended his marriage to Emma Brady”. Emma only found out after a friend in Denmark called her up to see how she was coping.
Emma, a mother of one who works as a conference organiser, was shocked by her husband’s actions. This was disclosed during a magistrate’s court hearing in Blackburn at Neil’s sentencing hearing for allegedly assaulting Emma at their home in nearby Accrington.
The Daily Mail had also reported that Emma only joined Facebook because the girls at work said it was good fun.
“What upset me the most was not the fact that Neil had written he had ended our marriage, but the comment from a girl in Canada who said: ‘You are better off out of it’. It hurt me that he had been speaking to someone else about it,” Emma told the Daily Mail .
Emma alleges that even after Neil posted that message, he still didn't tell her for a while that he wanted a divorce.
“He acted like everything was fine, so we carried on as normal,” she said.
Neil Brady said he did tell his wife about wanting to leave her, stating, “I'd had enough of her.”
Neil now lives with his mother.
Recent divorce declarations made via SMS
2006: Singer Noraniza Idris claimed to have a received an SMS from then husband Fauzi Mohd Tajuddin (or better known as Fareez) seeking a divorce.
October 2008: Actor Nasrizal Ngasri, 28, better known as Bell, sent an SMS at 3pm on Oct 22, 2008, to his wife Nur Farhana Mahamad Fauri or Sasha. In it, he had stated: "Aku ceraikan kau (I divorce you). Thank you. Selamat berjaya (All the best)." Bell later stated that the statement was made without malice.
Nov 18, 2008: Renowned painter Raja Azhar Raja Lop Idris sent an SMS divorcing his then wife Charmaine Winifred Idris.
Nov 25, 2008: Dino Rais, son of Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim, divorced his then wife Riza Ainurin Ramlan through an SMS
dimanche 8 février 2009
En Allemagne, chassez le naturel, il revient au galop !
GERMANY BLAMES THE JEWS .....AGAIN
German Chief Criminalizes Pro-Israel Protesters
So the Death to the Jews marches and the promises of a second holocaust is the Jews' fault. Spoken like a true Nazi. Good luck with that, bastard.
Over at Allah's Willing Executioners: (hat tip Robert Spencer)
The head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution of the German federal state North Rhine - Westphalia, Hartwig Möller (Picture), has criminalized pro-Israel and pro-USA protesters. In an interview with the newspaper Ruhr Nachrichten, he described the presentation of an Israel - Flag in a violent Islamists - rally in Duisburg as "targeted provocation". The flag was removed by the police (as reported). Mr Möller blames so-called anti-Germans for the hanging of the Israeli flag. In the interview Möller said:
Center of the political objectives of the anti-Germans is the unconditional support of Israel and thus Israel's protective power USA.
65 years ago they forced us to wear the Star of David.
Now the Germans force us to remove the Star of David.
German Chief Criminalizes Pro-Israel Protesters
So the Death to the Jews marches and the promises of a second holocaust is the Jews' fault. Spoken like a true Nazi. Good luck with that, bastard.
Over at Allah's Willing Executioners: (hat tip Robert Spencer)
The head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution of the German federal state North Rhine - Westphalia, Hartwig Möller (Picture), has criminalized pro-Israel and pro-USA protesters. In an interview with the newspaper Ruhr Nachrichten, he described the presentation of an Israel - Flag in a violent Islamists - rally in Duisburg as "targeted provocation". The flag was removed by the police (as reported). Mr Möller blames so-called anti-Germans for the hanging of the Israeli flag. In the interview Möller said:
Center of the political objectives of the anti-Germans is the unconditional support of Israel and thus Israel's protective power USA.
65 years ago they forced us to wear the Star of David.
Now the Germans force us to remove the Star of David.
samedi 7 février 2009
Obama commence à se coucher devant l'islam
Les mahométans dont il est question dans cet article affirment qu'il n'y a aucun lien entre l'islam et le terrorisme qui ensanglante la planète. Il faudait être malveillant en effet pour faire un tel rapprochement ! Mais pensez-donc, il y a des esprits chagrins qui ont osé affirmer qu'il y avait un lien entre l'idéologie nazie et la Shoah. Comme quoi personne n'est jamais à l'abri de la malveillance de ceux qui rapprochent tout et n'importe quoi !
Source : article de Bivouac, remarquablement informé, comme toujours.
Barack H. Obama doit prochainement prononcer un grand discours de rapprochement avec les musulmans, dans une capitale musulmane.
Dans cette perspective, des dirigeants de pays musulmans ont dépéché des émissaires à Washington, pour demander que le discours d’Obama parle explicitement de ce qu’ils appellent la «cause profonde» du terrorisme.
Evidemment, il n’est pour eux pas question de mettre en cause l’islam ou la propagande islamique haineuse qu’ils entretiennent avec le plus grand soin.
Si la volonté n’est pas de dicter mot pour mot le discours qu’Obama, il s’agit tout au moins d’en tracer les grandes lignes de manière à ce que les musulmans puissent entendre ce qu’ils veulent entendre.
Lors d’une réunion organisée cette semaine par le Conseil de l’idéologie islamique du Pakistan, qui est un organisme consultatif du gouvernement, des ambassadeurs de pays musulmans, dans l’anticipation de ce discours, mettent en avant leurs recommandations qui, selon eux, devrait permettre d’améliorer les relations.
La nécessité d’identifier et d’aborder les «causes profondes» du terrorisme a été souligné par plusieurs intervenants, et le conflit israélo-palestinien est bien entendu mis en haut de leur liste. (Un peu comme la Tchécoslovaquie était pour Hitler la source du conflit. Les revendications territoriales islamiques ne s’arrêteront sûrement pas à la Palestine et au Cashmire. Le califat mondiale étant l’objectif à long terme de tout musulman croyant)
Pour l’Ambassadeur saoudien Ali Awadh Asseri, la discrimination conduit au mécontentement et il cite les Palestiniens. Également faisant allusion aux Palestiniens, l’Envoyé syrien Muhammad Raid Ismat a appelé à une distinction entre le terrorisme et ce qu’il appelle une lutte légitime pour une patrie.
(Le terrorisme, n’est pas “une lutte”. C’est un moyen de lutter, qui cible délibérement et par surprise les civils. Et ce, indépendamment de la cause qui est défendue.)
L’Ambassadeur iranien Mashaallah Shakeri a déclaré que les tentatives pour améliorer les relations avec l’islam ont été desservis par les sanctions occidentales, le soutien aux dictateurs, et l’hypothèse que la guerre est une solution aux problèmes.
“Le président Bush a suffisamment parlé au monde», a-t-il dit. “Maintenant, les États-Unis doivent [nous] écouter avant de parler.”
Selon les participants, l’islam a été mal compris par l’Occident qui a établi a tort des liens entre terrorisme et islam.
“Le sang versé et les attentats-suicide n’ont rien à voir avec l’Islam”, a déclaré le Ministre des Affaires religieuses Pakistanais , Hamid Saeed Kazmi. Ces activités sont menées par des éléments désireux de diffamer les musulmans, a t-il dit lors de cette réunion.
Source : CNSNEWS
Traduction d’extraits Bivouac-id.
Source : article de Bivouac, remarquablement informé, comme toujours.
Barack H. Obama doit prochainement prononcer un grand discours de rapprochement avec les musulmans, dans une capitale musulmane.
Dans cette perspective, des dirigeants de pays musulmans ont dépéché des émissaires à Washington, pour demander que le discours d’Obama parle explicitement de ce qu’ils appellent la «cause profonde» du terrorisme.
Evidemment, il n’est pour eux pas question de mettre en cause l’islam ou la propagande islamique haineuse qu’ils entretiennent avec le plus grand soin.
Si la volonté n’est pas de dicter mot pour mot le discours qu’Obama, il s’agit tout au moins d’en tracer les grandes lignes de manière à ce que les musulmans puissent entendre ce qu’ils veulent entendre.
Lors d’une réunion organisée cette semaine par le Conseil de l’idéologie islamique du Pakistan, qui est un organisme consultatif du gouvernement, des ambassadeurs de pays musulmans, dans l’anticipation de ce discours, mettent en avant leurs recommandations qui, selon eux, devrait permettre d’améliorer les relations.
La nécessité d’identifier et d’aborder les «causes profondes» du terrorisme a été souligné par plusieurs intervenants, et le conflit israélo-palestinien est bien entendu mis en haut de leur liste. (Un peu comme la Tchécoslovaquie était pour Hitler la source du conflit. Les revendications territoriales islamiques ne s’arrêteront sûrement pas à la Palestine et au Cashmire. Le califat mondiale étant l’objectif à long terme de tout musulman croyant)
Pour l’Ambassadeur saoudien Ali Awadh Asseri, la discrimination conduit au mécontentement et il cite les Palestiniens. Également faisant allusion aux Palestiniens, l’Envoyé syrien Muhammad Raid Ismat a appelé à une distinction entre le terrorisme et ce qu’il appelle une lutte légitime pour une patrie.
(Le terrorisme, n’est pas “une lutte”. C’est un moyen de lutter, qui cible délibérement et par surprise les civils. Et ce, indépendamment de la cause qui est défendue.)
L’Ambassadeur iranien Mashaallah Shakeri a déclaré que les tentatives pour améliorer les relations avec l’islam ont été desservis par les sanctions occidentales, le soutien aux dictateurs, et l’hypothèse que la guerre est une solution aux problèmes.
“Le président Bush a suffisamment parlé au monde», a-t-il dit. “Maintenant, les États-Unis doivent [nous] écouter avant de parler.”
Selon les participants, l’islam a été mal compris par l’Occident qui a établi a tort des liens entre terrorisme et islam.
“Le sang versé et les attentats-suicide n’ont rien à voir avec l’Islam”, a déclaré le Ministre des Affaires religieuses Pakistanais , Hamid Saeed Kazmi. Ces activités sont menées par des éléments désireux de diffamer les musulmans, a t-il dit lors de cette réunion.
Source : CNSNEWS
Traduction d’extraits Bivouac-id.
vendredi 6 février 2009
Les nazislamistes américains menacent les juifs
INTERVIEW WITH AMERICAN JIHADI WHO IS INCITING VIOLENCE AGAINST JEWISH TARGETS
Back on January 19th, I reported on the pathetically deranged jihadi jokestar in Queens who had promised a Mumbai style attack on the Chabad center in Brooklyn. It seems he has made a threatening video like the threatening video he made of me here.
World Net Daily interviewed him here.
U.S. Jewish targets listed on Muslim website WND
'Give them the Islamic message,' demands New York-based extremist
The video features a slideshow of images of wounded Palestinians and then repeatedly switches to pictures of Chabad's main headquarters in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. It then presents a picture of a blood-stained Jewish prayer book taken from inside a Jerusalem seminary following a deadly shooting massacre there last March that killed eight Jews.
The video ends with the sound of gunshots.
Asked whether the video montage was implying Chabad's headquarters should be targeted by Islamic violence, Khattab told WND, "It is what it is."
Khattab said he did not have the authority to issue a directive to carry out specific attacks.
Further petitioned to explain the intended meaning of the blood-soaked prayer book interspersed with images of Chabad's headquarters, Khattab replied, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
He told WND he supports Hamas' suicide bombings against Israelis, including attacks targeting cafes, restaurants and nightclubs.
"There is no such thing as Israeli civilian," he said. "I pray to Allah for the complete destruction of Israel."
In a video on his website, Khattab states he normally advises others to "just ignore [the Jews]. That's not racist. We don't like to deal with them ... but when there is a terrorist war of destruction, killing of kids ... [Israeli] genocide, then we have to take to the forefront."
Security bolstered at Chabad headquarters
Motti Seligson, a spokesman for Chabad, told WND although not all threats are serious, his organization is "work[ing] closely with law enforcement to ensure that all threats are handled properly, as safety is of paramount concern."
Immediately following RevolutionMuslim's first posting about Chabad two weeks ago, the NYPD stationed a large police presence, including NYPD vans, outside the Jewish group's headquarters.
NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelley called Chanina Sperlin, vice president of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, to assure him the police were looking into the situation and were taking any threats seriously.
Khattab said he was questioned by NYPD investigators.
Expert: Take threats seriously
One Chabad official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he was not particularly concerned about the alleged threats.
But U.S. terrorism expert Steve Emerson said videos like those posted on RevolutionMuslim.com should be taken seriously.
"Any site that advocates violence or provides incitement to violence has to be taken seriously," he told WND.
'We appreciate support of American progressives'
Realizing his statement may attract the attention of U.S. law enforcement agencies, Khattab delivered a direct message to the NYPD, CIA and FBI: "You can put me in jail for the rest of my life. As long as I got that information out there for people, I did something. I didn't sit on my behind."
Khattab also lashed out against any website that may pick up on his statement.
"It just attracts Drudge, the JAWA report, Atlas Shrugs (blog), and Robert Spencer (Jihad Watch blog) and just other whining little queers and stuff like that."
But he celebrated what he said is his website's non-Muslim following of "progressive Americans, socialists, anarchists, communists ... people who can really contribute, they give us dialogue and send us nice e-mails."
The leftist Islamic alliance
Khattab, a 39-year-old New York taxi driver who converted to Islam from Judaism, said he launched RevolutionMuslim.com with the mission of "preserving Islamic culture," "calling people to the oneness of God" and asking them to "support the beloved Sheik Abdullah Faisal, who's preaching the religion of Islam and serving as a spiritual guide.
He told WND his site's main goal is to establish worldwide Islamic dominance. He runs the site from his home in Queens, N.Y., and even advertises his personal phone number.
Faisal, the website's spiritual adviser, was convicted in the UK in 2003 for urging his followers to kill Jews, Hindus and Westerners. In videotaped recordings, Faisal was taped delivering sermons calling on Muslims to use chemical weapons to "exterminate unbelievers" and "cut the throat of the Kaffars (nonbelievers) with (a) machete."
Back on January 19th, I reported on the pathetically deranged jihadi jokestar in Queens who had promised a Mumbai style attack on the Chabad center in Brooklyn. It seems he has made a threatening video like the threatening video he made of me here.
World Net Daily interviewed him here.
U.S. Jewish targets listed on Muslim website WND
'Give them the Islamic message,' demands New York-based extremist
The video features a slideshow of images of wounded Palestinians and then repeatedly switches to pictures of Chabad's main headquarters in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. It then presents a picture of a blood-stained Jewish prayer book taken from inside a Jerusalem seminary following a deadly shooting massacre there last March that killed eight Jews.
The video ends with the sound of gunshots.
Asked whether the video montage was implying Chabad's headquarters should be targeted by Islamic violence, Khattab told WND, "It is what it is."
Khattab said he did not have the authority to issue a directive to carry out specific attacks.
Further petitioned to explain the intended meaning of the blood-soaked prayer book interspersed with images of Chabad's headquarters, Khattab replied, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
He told WND he supports Hamas' suicide bombings against Israelis, including attacks targeting cafes, restaurants and nightclubs.
"There is no such thing as Israeli civilian," he said. "I pray to Allah for the complete destruction of Israel."
In a video on his website, Khattab states he normally advises others to "just ignore [the Jews]. That's not racist. We don't like to deal with them ... but when there is a terrorist war of destruction, killing of kids ... [Israeli] genocide, then we have to take to the forefront."
Security bolstered at Chabad headquarters
Motti Seligson, a spokesman for Chabad, told WND although not all threats are serious, his organization is "work[ing] closely with law enforcement to ensure that all threats are handled properly, as safety is of paramount concern."
Immediately following RevolutionMuslim's first posting about Chabad two weeks ago, the NYPD stationed a large police presence, including NYPD vans, outside the Jewish group's headquarters.
NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelley called Chanina Sperlin, vice president of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, to assure him the police were looking into the situation and were taking any threats seriously.
Khattab said he was questioned by NYPD investigators.
Expert: Take threats seriously
One Chabad official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he was not particularly concerned about the alleged threats.
But U.S. terrorism expert Steve Emerson said videos like those posted on RevolutionMuslim.com should be taken seriously.
"Any site that advocates violence or provides incitement to violence has to be taken seriously," he told WND.
'We appreciate support of American progressives'
Realizing his statement may attract the attention of U.S. law enforcement agencies, Khattab delivered a direct message to the NYPD, CIA and FBI: "You can put me in jail for the rest of my life. As long as I got that information out there for people, I did something. I didn't sit on my behind."
Khattab also lashed out against any website that may pick up on his statement.
"It just attracts Drudge, the JAWA report, Atlas Shrugs (blog), and Robert Spencer (Jihad Watch blog) and just other whining little queers and stuff like that."
But he celebrated what he said is his website's non-Muslim following of "progressive Americans, socialists, anarchists, communists ... people who can really contribute, they give us dialogue and send us nice e-mails."
The leftist Islamic alliance
Khattab, a 39-year-old New York taxi driver who converted to Islam from Judaism, said he launched RevolutionMuslim.com with the mission of "preserving Islamic culture," "calling people to the oneness of God" and asking them to "support the beloved Sheik Abdullah Faisal, who's preaching the religion of Islam and serving as a spiritual guide.
He told WND his site's main goal is to establish worldwide Islamic dominance. He runs the site from his home in Queens, N.Y., and even advertises his personal phone number.
Faisal, the website's spiritual adviser, was convicted in the UK in 2003 for urging his followers to kill Jews, Hindus and Westerners. In videotaped recordings, Faisal was taped delivering sermons calling on Muslims to use chemical weapons to "exterminate unbelievers" and "cut the throat of the Kaffars (nonbelievers) with (a) machete."
Encore une fois, nos amis italiens en ont assez des coutumes mahométanes
Italy:Bans Kebabs and Foreign Food From Cities
Posted: 04 Feb 2009 11:49 PM CST
Italy which is the only European Union country that is truly fighting back against Islam, has now banned any new ethnic food outlets from opening. The reason being is that they want to protect their culture. What novel idea.
Hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance
January 31, 2009
Italy bans kebabs and foreign food from cities
Richard Owen in Rome
The tomato comes from Peru and spaghetti was probably a gift from China.
It is, though, the “foreign” kebab that is being kicked out of Italian cities as it becomes the target of a campaign against ethnic food, backed by the centre-right Government of Silvio Berlusconi.
The drive to make Italians eat Italian, which was described by the Left and leading chefs as gastronomic racism, began in the town of Lucca this week, where the council banned any new ethnic food outlets from opening within the ancient city walls.
Yesterday it spread to Lombardy and its regional capital, Milan, which is also run by the centre Right. The antiimmigrant Northern League party brought in the restrictions “to protect local specialities from the growing popularity of ethnic cuisines”.
Luca Zaia, the Minister of Agriculture and a member of the Northern League from the Veneto region, applauded the authorities in Lucca and Milan for cracking down on nonItalian food. “We stand for tradition and the safeguarding of our culture,” he said.
Mr Zaia said that those ethnic restaurants allowed to operate “whether they serve kebabs, sushi or Chinese food” should “stop importing container loads of meat and fish from who knows where” and use only Italian ingredients.
Asked if he had ever eaten a kebab, Mr Zaia said: “No – and I defy anyone to prove the contrary. I prefer the dishes of my native Veneto. I even refuse to eat pineapple.”
Mehmet Karatut, who owns one of four kebab shops in Lucca, said that he used Italian meat only.
Davide Boni, a councillor in Milan for the Northern League, which also opposes the building of mosques in Italian cities, said that kebab shop owners were prepared to work long hours, which was unfair competition.
“This is a new Lombard Crusade against the Saracens,” La Stampa, the daily newspaper, said. The centre-left opposition in Lucca said that the campaign was discrimination and amounted to “culinary ethnic cleansing”.
Vittorio Castellani, a celebrity chef, said: “There is no dish on Earth that does not come from mixing techniques, products and tastes from cultures that have met and mingled over time.”
He said that many dishes thought of as Italian were, in fact, imported. The San Marzano tomato, a staple ingredient of Italian pasta sauces, was a gift from Peru to the Kingdom of Naples in the 18th century. Even spaghetti, it is thought, was brought back from China by Marco Polo, and oranges and lemons came from the Arab world.
Mr Castellani said that the ban reflected growing intolerance and xenophobia in Italy. It was also a blow to immigrants who make a living by selling ethnic food, which is popular because of its low cost. There are 668 ethnic restaurants in Milan, a rise of nearly 30 per cent in one year.
The centre Right won national elections in April last year partly because of alarm about crime and immigration. This week there was a series of attacks on immigrants in bars and shops after the arrest of six Romanians accused of gang-raping an Italian girl in the Rome suburb of Guidonia.
Filippo Candelise, a Lucca councillor, said: “To accuse us of racism is outrageous. All we are doing is protecting the culinary patrimony of the town."
Massimo Di Grazia, the city spokesman, said that the ban was intended to improve the image of the city and to protect Tuscan products. “It targets McDonald’s as much as kebab restaurants,” he added.
There is confusion, however, over what is meant by ethnic. Mr Di Grazia said that French restaurants would be allowed. He was unsure, though, about Sicilian cuisine. It is influenced by Arab cooking.
Posted: 04 Feb 2009 11:49 PM CST
Italy which is the only European Union country that is truly fighting back against Islam, has now banned any new ethnic food outlets from opening. The reason being is that they want to protect their culture. What novel idea.
Hat tip to Infidel Bloggers Alliance
January 31, 2009
Italy bans kebabs and foreign food from cities
Richard Owen in Rome
The tomato comes from Peru and spaghetti was probably a gift from China.
It is, though, the “foreign” kebab that is being kicked out of Italian cities as it becomes the target of a campaign against ethnic food, backed by the centre-right Government of Silvio Berlusconi.
The drive to make Italians eat Italian, which was described by the Left and leading chefs as gastronomic racism, began in the town of Lucca this week, where the council banned any new ethnic food outlets from opening within the ancient city walls.
Yesterday it spread to Lombardy and its regional capital, Milan, which is also run by the centre Right. The antiimmigrant Northern League party brought in the restrictions “to protect local specialities from the growing popularity of ethnic cuisines”.
Luca Zaia, the Minister of Agriculture and a member of the Northern League from the Veneto region, applauded the authorities in Lucca and Milan for cracking down on nonItalian food. “We stand for tradition and the safeguarding of our culture,” he said.
Mr Zaia said that those ethnic restaurants allowed to operate “whether they serve kebabs, sushi or Chinese food” should “stop importing container loads of meat and fish from who knows where” and use only Italian ingredients.
Asked if he had ever eaten a kebab, Mr Zaia said: “No – and I defy anyone to prove the contrary. I prefer the dishes of my native Veneto. I even refuse to eat pineapple.”
Mehmet Karatut, who owns one of four kebab shops in Lucca, said that he used Italian meat only.
Davide Boni, a councillor in Milan for the Northern League, which also opposes the building of mosques in Italian cities, said that kebab shop owners were prepared to work long hours, which was unfair competition.
“This is a new Lombard Crusade against the Saracens,” La Stampa, the daily newspaper, said. The centre-left opposition in Lucca said that the campaign was discrimination and amounted to “culinary ethnic cleansing”.
Vittorio Castellani, a celebrity chef, said: “There is no dish on Earth that does not come from mixing techniques, products and tastes from cultures that have met and mingled over time.”
He said that many dishes thought of as Italian were, in fact, imported. The San Marzano tomato, a staple ingredient of Italian pasta sauces, was a gift from Peru to the Kingdom of Naples in the 18th century. Even spaghetti, it is thought, was brought back from China by Marco Polo, and oranges and lemons came from the Arab world.
Mr Castellani said that the ban reflected growing intolerance and xenophobia in Italy. It was also a blow to immigrants who make a living by selling ethnic food, which is popular because of its low cost. There are 668 ethnic restaurants in Milan, a rise of nearly 30 per cent in one year.
The centre Right won national elections in April last year partly because of alarm about crime and immigration. This week there was a series of attacks on immigrants in bars and shops after the arrest of six Romanians accused of gang-raping an Italian girl in the Rome suburb of Guidonia.
Filippo Candelise, a Lucca councillor, said: “To accuse us of racism is outrageous. All we are doing is protecting the culinary patrimony of the town."
Massimo Di Grazia, the city spokesman, said that the ban was intended to improve the image of the city and to protect Tuscan products. “It targets McDonald’s as much as kebab restaurants,” he added.
There is confusion, however, over what is meant by ethnic. Mr Di Grazia said that French restaurants would be allowed. He was unsure, though, about Sicilian cuisine. It is influenced by Arab cooking.
Encore une bien bonne du nazislamiste Nazir Ahmed qui siège à la chambre des LOrds.
Once again we see how Muslims will use the freedoms of the West against us. This is why Muslims should not be put into positions of power in the first place as they will just use the power to advance their Islamic agenda.
MP: Arrest British Jews fighting for IDF
Tue, 03 Feb 2009
By Fareena Alam, Press TV, London
Lord Nazir Ahmed is one of Britain's most prominent Muslim leaders. This week, he questioned the British government about concerns that British Jews may have served in the Israeli Defense Force during Operation Cast Lead - the three-week bombardment of Gaza.
Lord Ahmed's questions have brought attention to an issue that has significant legal and political implications but which few want to discuss in public.
The following is an exclusive Press TV interview with Lord Ahmed:
Press TV: Lord Nazir Ahmed, you raised question in Parliament about the legal implications of British Jews serving in the IDF. What was the response?
Lord Ahmed: I asked Her Majesty's government if they were aware of British citizens who may have been involved with the war crimes committed by the Israeli Defense Force and Israeli Defense Reserves. Her Majesty's government did not have any figures because dual nationals do not have to inform the government. However, there are reports in the Daily Mirror and The Sun with the names of British citizens who have been fighting in Gaza.
The point I was making is that war crimes have been committed, white phosphorous has been used and if there are people who have broken the 4th Geneva Convention, then whoever they are, when they return to this country, they should be arrested and charged - unlike the Major General who escaped in 2005.
Press TV: Are you certain these are up to date reports about British citizens serving in Israel?
Lord Ahmed: These are very new reports, dated January 2009, of British citizens who have gone out to fight against the Palestinian people as part of the IDF. Their names and ages are mentioned in these reports.
We know that there are student unions that have been actively recruiting young people in Britain to join the Israeli Defense Force and we also know that there are young Jewish students who go and serve on the kibbutz and also in schools, who are also then doing national service in Israel.
How many of those have been involved in war crimes? How many of those have broken the Geneva Convention? When they come back to this country, we want our government to take some legal action against them.
Press TV: Will our government take such action?
Lord Ahmed: Yes - if there is evidence and if the United Nations is strong enough. At the moment they have not even decided how they are going to conduct this independent investigation into the use of white phosphorous and other weapons prohibited by the United Nations.
There is very clear evidence that the 4th Geneva Convention has been breached - we know there was collective punishment, excessive and disproportionate use of force against civilians and deliberate attacks on schools, hospitals and ambulances. There have even been attacks on UNRWA personnel and warehouses.
If the United Nations makes a statement or if someone goes to the courts and gets an order against these people then I am sure the government has to take some legal action.
Press TV: Were you surprised by the response from the government?
Lord Ahmed: I am not surprised at all. Lord Malloch-Brown did actually say that if there is any evidence of the 4th Geneva Convention being breached, and it doesn't matter whether they are British citizens or whether they are other nationalities, these people will be arrested and they will be tried in this country.
Press TV: How do you think the British Jewish community will react to such a move?
Lord Ahmed: Well the reaction was very obvious. One of their lordships got up and started to praise the British citizens who were fighting in Gaza. He said: shouldn't we be proud of the fact they are fighting against terrorists who are hell bent on trying to destroy Israel.
But they are not fighting against a terrorist organization as such. The IDF and those who serve in it have been involved in the massacre of civilians, including hundreds of Palestinian children and attacks on the United Nations and even the American school. There is just no excuse for anyone to get away from these war crimes this time.
Press TV: Is this situation comparable to British Muslims allegedly going to fight in foreign conflicts?
Lord Ahmed: There have been many government statements with regards to British Muslims going abroad to foreign madrasahs and then seeking training. There was a huge outcry across the board - from government officials, politicians and civil society.
Of course, we do not support anyone who has been involved with terrorism or killing of innocent civilians anywhere, or those who fight British troops abroad.
However, to me there is no difference whether the young person is from a Jewish background or Muslim background. The only difference is that one has a uniform and the other does not. Both kill innocent civilians. Both need to be brought justice.
This is why Baroness Tongue asked the question about the number of British youth who go to religious Jewish schools and also the kibbutz. In this case, it is a double standard to allow young British citizens of whatever religion, who go to religious schools and then get involved in armed conflicts and join a terrorist state.
The very fact that in both cases, they kill innocent civilians, including children warrants a fresh look at this issue, as was recommended by Lord Wallace of Saltaire.
Press TV: Are you expecting any progress now that you have raised the issue?
Lord Ahmed: My intention was to bring this matter to the attention of parliament. The second was to discuss this openly in the media. It has always been a taboo to ask any questions about Jewish youth who go to Israel for training and service in the IDF.
We have received a government statement. Now, it is for the legal experts to take it up in the courts and to make sure the government takes legal action against people who may have been in breach of international law.
As a general point, I was surprised by how the entire British society was moved by this crisis. In almost every town and city, people went out to demonstrate against the bombing and killing of innocent civilians. They put pressure on the government and at least the government has done a few things such as taking the resolution to the UN.
But more importantly, I have definitely seen the mood amongst British politicians change to become more openly critical of the Israeli government. Unfortunately, that is not the same in Europe.
We went to see the President of the European Parliament and met with a number of Members of the European Parliament who feel that Germany, Austria and France and other parts of Europe still have guilt in relation to the Holocaust. That is why Israel can get away with anything it wants.
We know that very fine members of parliament like Gerald Kaufman MP, who is himself Jewish, very openly said that just because these people were victims of the Holocaust does not mean they should perpetrate another holocaust on the Palestinian people.
We need to speak out and support Jews, like Gerald Kaufman and Jews for Justice for Palestine, who have been supporting the Palestinians.
MP: Arrest British Jews fighting for IDF
Tue, 03 Feb 2009
By Fareena Alam, Press TV, London
Lord Nazir Ahmed is one of Britain's most prominent Muslim leaders. This week, he questioned the British government about concerns that British Jews may have served in the Israeli Defense Force during Operation Cast Lead - the three-week bombardment of Gaza.
Lord Ahmed's questions have brought attention to an issue that has significant legal and political implications but which few want to discuss in public.
The following is an exclusive Press TV interview with Lord Ahmed:
Press TV: Lord Nazir Ahmed, you raised question in Parliament about the legal implications of British Jews serving in the IDF. What was the response?
Lord Ahmed: I asked Her Majesty's government if they were aware of British citizens who may have been involved with the war crimes committed by the Israeli Defense Force and Israeli Defense Reserves. Her Majesty's government did not have any figures because dual nationals do not have to inform the government. However, there are reports in the Daily Mirror and The Sun with the names of British citizens who have been fighting in Gaza.
The point I was making is that war crimes have been committed, white phosphorous has been used and if there are people who have broken the 4th Geneva Convention, then whoever they are, when they return to this country, they should be arrested and charged - unlike the Major General who escaped in 2005.
Press TV: Are you certain these are up to date reports about British citizens serving in Israel?
Lord Ahmed: These are very new reports, dated January 2009, of British citizens who have gone out to fight against the Palestinian people as part of the IDF. Their names and ages are mentioned in these reports.
We know that there are student unions that have been actively recruiting young people in Britain to join the Israeli Defense Force and we also know that there are young Jewish students who go and serve on the kibbutz and also in schools, who are also then doing national service in Israel.
How many of those have been involved in war crimes? How many of those have broken the Geneva Convention? When they come back to this country, we want our government to take some legal action against them.
Press TV: Will our government take such action?
Lord Ahmed: Yes - if there is evidence and if the United Nations is strong enough. At the moment they have not even decided how they are going to conduct this independent investigation into the use of white phosphorous and other weapons prohibited by the United Nations.
There is very clear evidence that the 4th Geneva Convention has been breached - we know there was collective punishment, excessive and disproportionate use of force against civilians and deliberate attacks on schools, hospitals and ambulances. There have even been attacks on UNRWA personnel and warehouses.
If the United Nations makes a statement or if someone goes to the courts and gets an order against these people then I am sure the government has to take some legal action.
Press TV: Were you surprised by the response from the government?
Lord Ahmed: I am not surprised at all. Lord Malloch-Brown did actually say that if there is any evidence of the 4th Geneva Convention being breached, and it doesn't matter whether they are British citizens or whether they are other nationalities, these people will be arrested and they will be tried in this country.
Press TV: How do you think the British Jewish community will react to such a move?
Lord Ahmed: Well the reaction was very obvious. One of their lordships got up and started to praise the British citizens who were fighting in Gaza. He said: shouldn't we be proud of the fact they are fighting against terrorists who are hell bent on trying to destroy Israel.
But they are not fighting against a terrorist organization as such. The IDF and those who serve in it have been involved in the massacre of civilians, including hundreds of Palestinian children and attacks on the United Nations and even the American school. There is just no excuse for anyone to get away from these war crimes this time.
Press TV: Is this situation comparable to British Muslims allegedly going to fight in foreign conflicts?
Lord Ahmed: There have been many government statements with regards to British Muslims going abroad to foreign madrasahs and then seeking training. There was a huge outcry across the board - from government officials, politicians and civil society.
Of course, we do not support anyone who has been involved with terrorism or killing of innocent civilians anywhere, or those who fight British troops abroad.
However, to me there is no difference whether the young person is from a Jewish background or Muslim background. The only difference is that one has a uniform and the other does not. Both kill innocent civilians. Both need to be brought justice.
This is why Baroness Tongue asked the question about the number of British youth who go to religious Jewish schools and also the kibbutz. In this case, it is a double standard to allow young British citizens of whatever religion, who go to religious schools and then get involved in armed conflicts and join a terrorist state.
The very fact that in both cases, they kill innocent civilians, including children warrants a fresh look at this issue, as was recommended by Lord Wallace of Saltaire.
Press TV: Are you expecting any progress now that you have raised the issue?
Lord Ahmed: My intention was to bring this matter to the attention of parliament. The second was to discuss this openly in the media. It has always been a taboo to ask any questions about Jewish youth who go to Israel for training and service in the IDF.
We have received a government statement. Now, it is for the legal experts to take it up in the courts and to make sure the government takes legal action against people who may have been in breach of international law.
As a general point, I was surprised by how the entire British society was moved by this crisis. In almost every town and city, people went out to demonstrate against the bombing and killing of innocent civilians. They put pressure on the government and at least the government has done a few things such as taking the resolution to the UN.
But more importantly, I have definitely seen the mood amongst British politicians change to become more openly critical of the Israeli government. Unfortunately, that is not the same in Europe.
We went to see the President of the European Parliament and met with a number of Members of the European Parliament who feel that Germany, Austria and France and other parts of Europe still have guilt in relation to the Holocaust. That is why Israel can get away with anything it wants.
We know that very fine members of parliament like Gerald Kaufman MP, who is himself Jewish, very openly said that just because these people were victims of the Holocaust does not mean they should perpetrate another holocaust on the Palestinian people.
We need to speak out and support Jews, like Gerald Kaufman and Jews for Justice for Palestine, who have been supporting the Palestinians.
Nazis ayant trouvé refuge dans des pays arabo-mahométans
Source : site de Bivouac
Liste des nazis ayant fui dans les pays arabes: sources, “le croissant et la croix gammée” Roger Faligot Albin Michel :
Altern Erich alias Ali Bella. Chef régional SD. Affaires juives en Galicie. Années 50, en Égypte, puis instructeur de camps palestiniens.
Appler Hans alias Salah Chaffar. Information avec Goebbels. Égypte, ministère de l’information (1956).
Bartel Franz alias el-Hussein. Adjoint au chef de la Gestapo à Kattowitz (Pologne). Depuis 1959, Section juive du ministère de l’Information au Caire.
Baurnann, SS Standartenührer. Participe à la liquidation du Ghetto de Varsovie. Ministère de la Guerre au Caire: instructeur du Front de Libération de la Palestine.
Bayerlein, col. Fritz. Aide-de-camp de Rommel. Égypte.
Becher Hans. Section juive Gestapo, Vienne. Alexandrie (Égypte) :y instruit la police.
Beissner, Dr Wilhelm. Chef Section VI C 13 RSHA. Égypte.
Bender Bernhardt alias Béchir Ben Salah. Gestapo, Varsovie. Conseiller de la police politique au Caire.
Birgel Werner alias El-Gamin. Officier SS. Vient de RDA au Caire, au ministère de l’Information.
Boeckler Wilhelm, SS Untersturmführer. Recherché en Pologne pour son rôle dans la liquidation du Ghetto de Varsovie. En Égypte depuis 1949, travaille au département Israël du Bureau d’informations.
Boerner Wilhelm alias Ali Ben Keshir, SS Untersturmführer. Gardien du camp de Mauthausen. Dépend du ministère de l’Intérieur égyptien, instructeur du Front de Libération de la Palestine.
Brunner Aloïs alias Georg Fischer, Ali Mohammed. SD, responsable des déportations en Autriche, Tchécoslovaquie, Grèce, Chef du camp de Drancy. Damas, conseiller des services spéciaux RAU puis syriens. Résident BND.
Buble Friedrich alias Ben Amman. SS Obergruppenfùhrer, Gestapo. Dir. Département égyptien des relations publiques - 1952 conseiller de la police égyptienne.
Bünsch Franz. Collaborateur de Goebbels à la propagande, coauteur, avec Eichmann de Les Habitudes sexuelles des juifs. Correspondant du BND au Caire puis en 1958 organisateur des SR d’Arabie saoudite pour le BND.
Bunzel Erich, SA, Obersturmführer. Collaborateur de Goebbels. Département Israël, ministère de l’Information au Caire.
Daemling Joachim alias Jochen Dressel ou Ibrahim Mustapha. Chef de la Gestapo de Düsseldorf. Conseiller du système pénitentiaire égyptien, fait partie des services de Radio-Le Caire.
Dirlewanger Oskar, Oberführer. Chef du 36e bataillon de Waffen SS (URSS, Pologne).
Au Caire depuis 1950 selon certaines sources, selon d’autres, décédé le 7 juin 45 en résidence surveillée en Allemagne. Une exhumation de son cadavre aurait eu lieu en 1960.
Eisele Dr Hans. Médecin chef camp de Buchenwald inoculateur du typhus sur des déportés. Décédé au Caire, le 4 mai 1965.
Farmbacher Wilhelm, LieutenantGénéral SS Wehrmacht front Est, supervise l’armée Vlassov en France en 1944. Conseiller militaire de Nasser en Egypte.
Gleim Leopold alias Lt-Col. Al Nashar. Chef du SD à Varsovie. Cadre de la Sécurité d’État égyptienne chargé des détenus politiques sur la mer Rouge.
Gruber alias Aradji. Recruté par Canaris en 1924; réside en Égypte 1950 : agent d’influence en direction de la Ligue arabe.
Heiden Ludwig alias el-Hadj. journaliste à l’agence antijuive Weltdienst (NSDAP).
Converti à l’Islam, traduit Mein Kampf en arabe, résidant en Égypte vers 1950.
Heim Heribert, SS Hauptsturmführer. Médecin de Mauthausen. Médecin de la police égyptienne.
Hithofer Franz. Cadre de la Gestapo à Vienne. Égypte, années 50.
Leers, Dr Johannes von alias Omar Amin. Adjoint de Goebbels, chargé de la propagande antisémite.Responsable de la propagande anti-israélienne au Caire depuis 1955.
Luder Karl,Chef des jeunesses hitlériennes, responsable de crimes antisémites en Pologne.Ministère de la Guerre au Caire.
Mildner Rudolf, SS. Standartenführer.Chef de la Gestapo à Kattowitz, chef de la police au Danemark. Depuis 1963, vit en Égypte, membre de l’organisation Deutscher Rat.
Moser Aloïs, Gruppenführer SS. Recherché en URSS pour crimes contre les juifs.
Instructeur des mouvements paramilitaires de jeunesse au Caire.
Münzel Oskar, Général SS de blindés. Conseiller militaire au Caire, années 50.
Nimzek Gerd von alias Ben Ali. En Égypte, années 50
Oltramare Georges alias Charles Dieudonné. Directeur du Pilori en France sous l’Occupation. Responsable de l’émetteur La Voix des Arabes au Caire. Décédé en 1960.
Peschnik Aehim Dieter alias el-Saïd. Réside en Égypte.
Rademacher Franz alias Thomé Rossel. 1940-1943, dirige la section antijuive aux Affaires étrangères. Journaliste à Damas.
Rauff Walter. Chef du SD en Tunisie. Au Moyen-Orient (Syrie) jusqu’en 1961. Arrêté, puis relâché au Chili, le 4 décembre 1962.
Seipel, SS Sturmbannführer alias Emmad Zuher. Gestapo à Paris. Converti à l’Islam. Service de sécurité du ministère de l’Intérieur au Caire.
Sellmann Heinrich alias Hassan Suleiman. Chef de la Gestapo à Ulm. Au Caire, Services spéciaux égyptiens.
Thiemann Albert alias Amman Kader. Officier SS en Tchécoslovaquie.
Weinmann Erich, SS Standartenführer. Chef SD, Prague. Déclaré mort en 1949. En fait, à Alexandrie conseiller de la police.
Source: http://aval31.free.fr/texteracines/1967.htm#criminels%20de%20guerre%20nazis
Liste des nazis ayant fui dans les pays arabes: sources, “le croissant et la croix gammée” Roger Faligot Albin Michel :
Altern Erich alias Ali Bella. Chef régional SD. Affaires juives en Galicie. Années 50, en Égypte, puis instructeur de camps palestiniens.
Appler Hans alias Salah Chaffar. Information avec Goebbels. Égypte, ministère de l’information (1956).
Bartel Franz alias el-Hussein. Adjoint au chef de la Gestapo à Kattowitz (Pologne). Depuis 1959, Section juive du ministère de l’Information au Caire.
Baurnann, SS Standartenührer. Participe à la liquidation du Ghetto de Varsovie. Ministère de la Guerre au Caire: instructeur du Front de Libération de la Palestine.
Bayerlein, col. Fritz. Aide-de-camp de Rommel. Égypte.
Becher Hans. Section juive Gestapo, Vienne. Alexandrie (Égypte) :y instruit la police.
Beissner, Dr Wilhelm. Chef Section VI C 13 RSHA. Égypte.
Bender Bernhardt alias Béchir Ben Salah. Gestapo, Varsovie. Conseiller de la police politique au Caire.
Birgel Werner alias El-Gamin. Officier SS. Vient de RDA au Caire, au ministère de l’Information.
Boeckler Wilhelm, SS Untersturmführer. Recherché en Pologne pour son rôle dans la liquidation du Ghetto de Varsovie. En Égypte depuis 1949, travaille au département Israël du Bureau d’informations.
Boerner Wilhelm alias Ali Ben Keshir, SS Untersturmführer. Gardien du camp de Mauthausen. Dépend du ministère de l’Intérieur égyptien, instructeur du Front de Libération de la Palestine.
Brunner Aloïs alias Georg Fischer, Ali Mohammed. SD, responsable des déportations en Autriche, Tchécoslovaquie, Grèce, Chef du camp de Drancy. Damas, conseiller des services spéciaux RAU puis syriens. Résident BND.
Buble Friedrich alias Ben Amman. SS Obergruppenfùhrer, Gestapo. Dir. Département égyptien des relations publiques - 1952 conseiller de la police égyptienne.
Bünsch Franz. Collaborateur de Goebbels à la propagande, coauteur, avec Eichmann de Les Habitudes sexuelles des juifs. Correspondant du BND au Caire puis en 1958 organisateur des SR d’Arabie saoudite pour le BND.
Bunzel Erich, SA, Obersturmführer. Collaborateur de Goebbels. Département Israël, ministère de l’Information au Caire.
Daemling Joachim alias Jochen Dressel ou Ibrahim Mustapha. Chef de la Gestapo de Düsseldorf. Conseiller du système pénitentiaire égyptien, fait partie des services de Radio-Le Caire.
Dirlewanger Oskar, Oberführer. Chef du 36e bataillon de Waffen SS (URSS, Pologne).
Au Caire depuis 1950 selon certaines sources, selon d’autres, décédé le 7 juin 45 en résidence surveillée en Allemagne. Une exhumation de son cadavre aurait eu lieu en 1960.
Eisele Dr Hans. Médecin chef camp de Buchenwald inoculateur du typhus sur des déportés. Décédé au Caire, le 4 mai 1965.
Farmbacher Wilhelm, LieutenantGénéral SS Wehrmacht front Est, supervise l’armée Vlassov en France en 1944. Conseiller militaire de Nasser en Egypte.
Gleim Leopold alias Lt-Col. Al Nashar. Chef du SD à Varsovie. Cadre de la Sécurité d’État égyptienne chargé des détenus politiques sur la mer Rouge.
Gruber alias Aradji. Recruté par Canaris en 1924; réside en Égypte 1950 : agent d’influence en direction de la Ligue arabe.
Heiden Ludwig alias el-Hadj. journaliste à l’agence antijuive Weltdienst (NSDAP).
Converti à l’Islam, traduit Mein Kampf en arabe, résidant en Égypte vers 1950.
Heim Heribert, SS Hauptsturmführer. Médecin de Mauthausen. Médecin de la police égyptienne.
Hithofer Franz. Cadre de la Gestapo à Vienne. Égypte, années 50.
Leers, Dr Johannes von alias Omar Amin. Adjoint de Goebbels, chargé de la propagande antisémite.Responsable de la propagande anti-israélienne au Caire depuis 1955.
Luder Karl,Chef des jeunesses hitlériennes, responsable de crimes antisémites en Pologne.Ministère de la Guerre au Caire.
Mildner Rudolf, SS. Standartenführer.Chef de la Gestapo à Kattowitz, chef de la police au Danemark. Depuis 1963, vit en Égypte, membre de l’organisation Deutscher Rat.
Moser Aloïs, Gruppenführer SS. Recherché en URSS pour crimes contre les juifs.
Instructeur des mouvements paramilitaires de jeunesse au Caire.
Münzel Oskar, Général SS de blindés. Conseiller militaire au Caire, années 50.
Nimzek Gerd von alias Ben Ali. En Égypte, années 50
Oltramare Georges alias Charles Dieudonné. Directeur du Pilori en France sous l’Occupation. Responsable de l’émetteur La Voix des Arabes au Caire. Décédé en 1960.
Peschnik Aehim Dieter alias el-Saïd. Réside en Égypte.
Rademacher Franz alias Thomé Rossel. 1940-1943, dirige la section antijuive aux Affaires étrangères. Journaliste à Damas.
Rauff Walter. Chef du SD en Tunisie. Au Moyen-Orient (Syrie) jusqu’en 1961. Arrêté, puis relâché au Chili, le 4 décembre 1962.
Seipel, SS Sturmbannführer alias Emmad Zuher. Gestapo à Paris. Converti à l’Islam. Service de sécurité du ministère de l’Intérieur au Caire.
Sellmann Heinrich alias Hassan Suleiman. Chef de la Gestapo à Ulm. Au Caire, Services spéciaux égyptiens.
Thiemann Albert alias Amman Kader. Officier SS en Tchécoslovaquie.
Weinmann Erich, SS Standartenführer. Chef SD, Prague. Déclaré mort en 1949. En fait, à Alexandrie conseiller de la police.
Source: http://aval31.free.fr/texteracines/1967.htm#criminels%20de%20guerre%20nazis
jeudi 5 février 2009
Un criminel de guerre nazi réfugié dans un pays mahométan !
Et bien entendu, c'est seulement un hasard s'il s'est aussi converti à l'islam !
Arrêté par les Américains en 1945, Heim réussit à cacher son passé et est libéré deux ans plus tard. Il est bientôt à la tête d'un cabinet de gynécologie allemand à Baden-Baden. Crédits photo : AFP
La télévision allemande et le New York Times affirment que le «médecin de la mort» Aribert Heim, recherché depuis un demi-siècle pour avoir été l'un des bourreaux du camp de Mauthausen, serait mort d'un cancer au Caire en 1992.
«Si la nouvelle est vraie, ce serait un séisme», souligne le centre Simon Wiesenthal qui s'emploie depuis plus de 60 ans à traquer les criminels nazis. A en croire la télévision allemande ZDF, Aribert Heim, un des responsables nazis les plus recherchés et que l'on croyait, encore l'été dernier, réfugié au Chili, aurait succombé en 1992 à un cancer des intestins. Celui que l'on avait surnommé « Doktor Tod » (le docteur de la mort) et qui était considéré comme un des criminels nazis les plus sadiques serait mort en Egypte, où il se cachait après s'être converti à l'Islam.
La ZDF affirme avoir eu copie de son acte de décès et avoir retrouvé son passeport, une demande de permis de séjour, des relevés bancaires, des lettres personnelles et des documents médicaux. Selon la chaîne allemande qui a mené son enquête avec le New York Times, il se serait installé au Caire au début des années 1980, où il aurait résidé sous le nom de Tarek Farid Hussein. Les Cairois qui l'ont côtoyé se souviennent d'un homme pieux, passionné de photographie, qui se rendait tous les jours à la mosquée et qui n'hésitait pas à offrir des gâteaux au chocolat à ses amis et des bonbons aux enfants, raconte le New York Times.
Le fils d'Aribert Heim, Ruediger Heim, qui était au côté du criminel lors de sa mort , a confirmé à la chaîne allemande qu'Aribert Heim et Tarek Farid Hussein ne faisaient qu'un. Le Centre Wiesenthal se veut prudent. « Les informations ont l'air sérieuses mais j'attends confirmation par mes propres sources, et il y a diverses questions qui se posent», a insisté le directeur de l'antenne israélienne du Centre Simon Wiesenthal, Ephraïm Zuroff.
Beaucoup de fausses rumeurs
Né en Autriche en 1914 et entré dans la Waffen SS en 1940, Aribert Heim est soupçonné d'avoir assassiné et torturé des centaines de détenus du camp de concentration autrichien de Mauthausen en leur injectant du poison dans le cœur ou en effectuant des éviscérations sans anesthésie. Il a longtemps été en deuxième position sur la liste des criminels nazis les plus recherchés au monde, après Alois Brunner. Brunner qui fut le principal assistant d'Adolf Eichmann, responsable de l'organisation de la Solution finale, est aujourd'hui présumé mort.
Recherché par l'Allemagne et l'Autriche, Aribert Heim était visé par un mandat d'arrêt international. Une prime totale de 315.000 euros était promise à toute personne permettant son arrestation. Sa traque a alimenté toutes les rumeurs. Le Centre Wiesenthal, a cru retrouver sa trace en Argentine, en Egypte, où il aurait travaillé comme médecin pour la police égyptienne, mais aussi en Uruguay, en Espagne et au Chili où vivait sa fille illégitime. En 2007, un ancien militaire israélien, Danny Baz, avait affirmé dans un livre que Heim a été capturé, jugé puis exécuté en 1982 par un groupe nommé La Chouette, qui entendait poursuivre la chasse des criminels nazis abandonnée par Israël après l'exécution d'Eichmann. Une version des faits « inexacte » avait rétorqué le Centre Wiesenthal.
Arrêté par les Américains en 1945, Heim réussit à cacher son passé et est libéré deux ans plus tard. Il est bientôt à la tête d'un cabinet de gynécologie allemand à Baden-Baden. Crédits photo : AFP
La télévision allemande et le New York Times affirment que le «médecin de la mort» Aribert Heim, recherché depuis un demi-siècle pour avoir été l'un des bourreaux du camp de Mauthausen, serait mort d'un cancer au Caire en 1992.
«Si la nouvelle est vraie, ce serait un séisme», souligne le centre Simon Wiesenthal qui s'emploie depuis plus de 60 ans à traquer les criminels nazis. A en croire la télévision allemande ZDF, Aribert Heim, un des responsables nazis les plus recherchés et que l'on croyait, encore l'été dernier, réfugié au Chili, aurait succombé en 1992 à un cancer des intestins. Celui que l'on avait surnommé « Doktor Tod » (le docteur de la mort) et qui était considéré comme un des criminels nazis les plus sadiques serait mort en Egypte, où il se cachait après s'être converti à l'Islam.
La ZDF affirme avoir eu copie de son acte de décès et avoir retrouvé son passeport, une demande de permis de séjour, des relevés bancaires, des lettres personnelles et des documents médicaux. Selon la chaîne allemande qui a mené son enquête avec le New York Times, il se serait installé au Caire au début des années 1980, où il aurait résidé sous le nom de Tarek Farid Hussein. Les Cairois qui l'ont côtoyé se souviennent d'un homme pieux, passionné de photographie, qui se rendait tous les jours à la mosquée et qui n'hésitait pas à offrir des gâteaux au chocolat à ses amis et des bonbons aux enfants, raconte le New York Times.
Le fils d'Aribert Heim, Ruediger Heim, qui était au côté du criminel lors de sa mort , a confirmé à la chaîne allemande qu'Aribert Heim et Tarek Farid Hussein ne faisaient qu'un. Le Centre Wiesenthal se veut prudent. « Les informations ont l'air sérieuses mais j'attends confirmation par mes propres sources, et il y a diverses questions qui se posent», a insisté le directeur de l'antenne israélienne du Centre Simon Wiesenthal, Ephraïm Zuroff.
Beaucoup de fausses rumeurs
Né en Autriche en 1914 et entré dans la Waffen SS en 1940, Aribert Heim est soupçonné d'avoir assassiné et torturé des centaines de détenus du camp de concentration autrichien de Mauthausen en leur injectant du poison dans le cœur ou en effectuant des éviscérations sans anesthésie. Il a longtemps été en deuxième position sur la liste des criminels nazis les plus recherchés au monde, après Alois Brunner. Brunner qui fut le principal assistant d'Adolf Eichmann, responsable de l'organisation de la Solution finale, est aujourd'hui présumé mort.
Recherché par l'Allemagne et l'Autriche, Aribert Heim était visé par un mandat d'arrêt international. Une prime totale de 315.000 euros était promise à toute personne permettant son arrestation. Sa traque a alimenté toutes les rumeurs. Le Centre Wiesenthal, a cru retrouver sa trace en Argentine, en Egypte, où il aurait travaillé comme médecin pour la police égyptienne, mais aussi en Uruguay, en Espagne et au Chili où vivait sa fille illégitime. En 2007, un ancien militaire israélien, Danny Baz, avait affirmé dans un livre que Heim a été capturé, jugé puis exécuté en 1982 par un groupe nommé La Chouette, qui entendait poursuivre la chasse des criminels nazis abandonnée par Israël après l'exécution d'Eichmann. Une version des faits « inexacte » avait rétorqué le Centre Wiesenthal.
mercredi 4 février 2009
Les violences mahométanes contre les femmes
SECULAR ISLAM: 'WIFE BEATING VIRTUALLY INSTITUTIONALIZED"
You can judge the health of any society by how they treat the women. From the wonderful world of secular Islam:
Health Workers Facilitate Wife Beating Digital Journal (hat tip wolf)
Although it is condemned by helping organizations around the world, wife beating is common in many places. What’s worse is when health workers facilitate or condone it as recently reported in a study done in Turkey.
In Turkey which has wife-beating virtually institutionalized, a high percentage of health workers don't respond or work with the victims of domestic violence in sympathetic ways. That’s because the culture accepts wife- beating. On a questionnaire 69.0% of the female and 84.7% of the male health workers stated that the agreed to or partially agreed to at least one reason to excuse physical violence.
The accepted grounds for beating one’s wife in Turkey includes criticizing the man, lying to him or refusing to care for the children. Deceiving the husband is the most serious offense with over half of female doctors agreeing that the man should be able to punish the wife physically if the wife deceived him. These are accepted grounds also for honor killings.
Because of the cultural rigidity on the matter of approving wife-beating most health care workers in Turkey don’t know the legal issues nor is there any real training in the country to help medical personnel identify and report signs of physical abuse.
You can judge the health of any society by how they treat the women. From the wonderful world of secular Islam:
Health Workers Facilitate Wife Beating Digital Journal (hat tip wolf)
Although it is condemned by helping organizations around the world, wife beating is common in many places. What’s worse is when health workers facilitate or condone it as recently reported in a study done in Turkey.
In Turkey which has wife-beating virtually institutionalized, a high percentage of health workers don't respond or work with the victims of domestic violence in sympathetic ways. That’s because the culture accepts wife- beating. On a questionnaire 69.0% of the female and 84.7% of the male health workers stated that the agreed to or partially agreed to at least one reason to excuse physical violence.
The accepted grounds for beating one’s wife in Turkey includes criticizing the man, lying to him or refusing to care for the children. Deceiving the husband is the most serious offense with over half of female doctors agreeing that the man should be able to punish the wife physically if the wife deceived him. These are accepted grounds also for honor killings.
Because of the cultural rigidity on the matter of approving wife-beating most health care workers in Turkey don’t know the legal issues nor is there any real training in the country to help medical personnel identify and report signs of physical abuse.
An Overview of American Islam
Part One: An Overview of American Islam
By Kathy Shaidle
Imagine a Super Bowl with all male cheerleaders and half-time prayers. In that America, they drink Jihad Cola instead of Coke and thank Allah when they win an Oscar.
Luckily, that America is fictional, one vividly described in Robert Ferrigno's 2006 futuristic novel, Prayers for the Assassin, set in 2040. But is it really so hard to imagine, in a world in which a man named "Barack Hussein Obama" can get elected President just a few years after Muslim hijackers destroyed the world's tallest buildings in the heart of New York City?
Today many Americans are either blissfully ignorant of, or simply indifferent to, the slow, incremental growth of radical Islam in their midst.
We sometimes hear about terrorist cells or suspicious Muslim "compounds" on the news. However, these stories represent merely the tip of an Islamic iceberg that could very well doom America. Not today or tomorrow. But in our lifetimes? That is a real possibility.
And don't shrug off Islam as "just another religion." Muslim sharia law deems women to be inferior to men, and allows husbands to "lightly" beat their wives. Polygamy and child bride marriage are condoned and encouraged, due to the example of Mohammed himself, whose many wives included a nine year old. Anti-Semitism and slavery are enshrined in the Koran, as is exploitation of and even violence against all "unbelievers."
Radical Muslims have learned they don't require bombs or hijacked airliners to destroy America. They can just use America's own ideological infrastructure against itself.
Using a kind of ingenious political jujitsu, radical Muslims rely upon everything from the rights to freedom of speech and worship enshrined in the U.S. Constitution to the current atmosphere of hypersensitive political correctness to push their agenda.
For example, the "Islamification" of the educational system is now underway. Textbooks whitewash Islam's bloody history. Public school children forbidden to pray or recite the Pledge of Allegiance are, however, obliged to play "Muslim for a Day." Meanwhile, universities eagerly introduce footbaths, Muslim prayer rooms and hallal cafeteria food.
Increasingly, Muslim employees are suing companies for the "right" to refuse to handle "unclean" pork or alcohol, or the "right" to wear headscarves. It is no coincidence that these companies include household names like UPS, Wal-Mart and McDonalds's - radical Muslims are sending a message to smaller firms who won't have the means to fight similar suits in the future.
These demands for accommodation extend even behind prison walls, where Muslim prisoners (indoctrinated by Muslim chaplains trained by foreign extremists) insist on getting special treatment as well.
"Lawfare" is on the rise, too. Muslim groups now file expensive, time-consuming lawsuits against critics of Islam, and while these suits are currently confined mostly to Canada and Europe, they have a "chilling" effect on American publishers, writers, journalists and filmmakers. Last year, it only took a couple of threatening emails to persuade a major U.S. publisher to cancel an upcoming novel about Mohammed.
Few Americans realize that their neighborhood mosque was probably built and financed by well-heeled terrorist sympathizers abroad. In fact, 80% of American mosques are Saudi-supported, and serve as safe gathering places for radical imams and dubious "charities" with anti-American agendas.
Islamic terrorism has also found a home on the internet, where (according to one UK think tank) a "virtual caliphate" (or Muslim supremacist empire) thrives, beyond the reach of authorities. The web has become an invaluable arena for radical Muslim recruiting, training, communication and organizing.
Americans looking to the government to protect them from these threats don't realize that federal agencies in the thrall of political correctness actually undermine the war of terrorism. Few Muslims currently hold public office in the United States, but this may change if Democrats begin to view them as a new source of donations and votes.
Over the next few months, I'll be your guide to the growth of radical Islam, both at home and abroad. You'll learn about "moderate" Muslim spokesmen who turn out to be anything but, and meet writers and authors censored by their governments for critiquing the Koran.
I'll be talking to experts in the fields of intelligence, religion, crime and foreign policy and sharing their insights with you.
Many Americans have already forgotten what happened on 9/11, or simply don't want to think about it anymore. Our fear, disgust or indifference is exactly what radical Muslims are counting on. As exhausting and demoralizing as it can be to educate ourselves on the facts, we must remember that "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
(Next: How prisons serve as incubators of radical Islam.)
Kathy Shaidle blogs at FiveFeetOfFury.com. Her new book, The Tyranny of Nice: How Canada crushes freedom in the name of human rights - and why it matters to Americans, features an introduction by Mark Steyn. Shaidle is also an advisor for the International Free Press Society.
By Kathy Shaidle
Imagine a Super Bowl with all male cheerleaders and half-time prayers. In that America, they drink Jihad Cola instead of Coke and thank Allah when they win an Oscar.
Luckily, that America is fictional, one vividly described in Robert Ferrigno's 2006 futuristic novel, Prayers for the Assassin, set in 2040. But is it really so hard to imagine, in a world in which a man named "Barack Hussein Obama" can get elected President just a few years after Muslim hijackers destroyed the world's tallest buildings in the heart of New York City?
Today many Americans are either blissfully ignorant of, or simply indifferent to, the slow, incremental growth of radical Islam in their midst.
We sometimes hear about terrorist cells or suspicious Muslim "compounds" on the news. However, these stories represent merely the tip of an Islamic iceberg that could very well doom America. Not today or tomorrow. But in our lifetimes? That is a real possibility.
And don't shrug off Islam as "just another religion." Muslim sharia law deems women to be inferior to men, and allows husbands to "lightly" beat their wives. Polygamy and child bride marriage are condoned and encouraged, due to the example of Mohammed himself, whose many wives included a nine year old. Anti-Semitism and slavery are enshrined in the Koran, as is exploitation of and even violence against all "unbelievers."
Radical Muslims have learned they don't require bombs or hijacked airliners to destroy America. They can just use America's own ideological infrastructure against itself.
Using a kind of ingenious political jujitsu, radical Muslims rely upon everything from the rights to freedom of speech and worship enshrined in the U.S. Constitution to the current atmosphere of hypersensitive political correctness to push their agenda.
For example, the "Islamification" of the educational system is now underway. Textbooks whitewash Islam's bloody history. Public school children forbidden to pray or recite the Pledge of Allegiance are, however, obliged to play "Muslim for a Day." Meanwhile, universities eagerly introduce footbaths, Muslim prayer rooms and hallal cafeteria food.
Increasingly, Muslim employees are suing companies for the "right" to refuse to handle "unclean" pork or alcohol, or the "right" to wear headscarves. It is no coincidence that these companies include household names like UPS, Wal-Mart and McDonalds's - radical Muslims are sending a message to smaller firms who won't have the means to fight similar suits in the future.
These demands for accommodation extend even behind prison walls, where Muslim prisoners (indoctrinated by Muslim chaplains trained by foreign extremists) insist on getting special treatment as well.
"Lawfare" is on the rise, too. Muslim groups now file expensive, time-consuming lawsuits against critics of Islam, and while these suits are currently confined mostly to Canada and Europe, they have a "chilling" effect on American publishers, writers, journalists and filmmakers. Last year, it only took a couple of threatening emails to persuade a major U.S. publisher to cancel an upcoming novel about Mohammed.
Few Americans realize that their neighborhood mosque was probably built and financed by well-heeled terrorist sympathizers abroad. In fact, 80% of American mosques are Saudi-supported, and serve as safe gathering places for radical imams and dubious "charities" with anti-American agendas.
Islamic terrorism has also found a home on the internet, where (according to one UK think tank) a "virtual caliphate" (or Muslim supremacist empire) thrives, beyond the reach of authorities. The web has become an invaluable arena for radical Muslim recruiting, training, communication and organizing.
Americans looking to the government to protect them from these threats don't realize that federal agencies in the thrall of political correctness actually undermine the war of terrorism. Few Muslims currently hold public office in the United States, but this may change if Democrats begin to view them as a new source of donations and votes.
Over the next few months, I'll be your guide to the growth of radical Islam, both at home and abroad. You'll learn about "moderate" Muslim spokesmen who turn out to be anything but, and meet writers and authors censored by their governments for critiquing the Koran.
I'll be talking to experts in the fields of intelligence, religion, crime and foreign policy and sharing their insights with you.
Many Americans have already forgotten what happened on 9/11, or simply don't want to think about it anymore. Our fear, disgust or indifference is exactly what radical Muslims are counting on. As exhausting and demoralizing as it can be to educate ourselves on the facts, we must remember that "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
(Next: How prisons serve as incubators of radical Islam.)
Kathy Shaidle blogs at FiveFeetOfFury.com. Her new book, The Tyranny of Nice: How Canada crushes freedom in the name of human rights - and why it matters to Americans, features an introduction by Mark Steyn. Shaidle is also an advisor for the International Free Press Society.
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)