Mais au fait, qui est cette sinistre crapule ?
Lord Ahmed Threatens Parliament Into Submission
A Member of Congress announces she is inviting Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders to come to Washington to meet with members of Congress and discuss his documentary film “Fitna.”
When Congressman Abdullah hears about this, he threatens the Member and the entire Congress that, unless Mr. Wilders’ visit is cancelled, he will mobilize 10,000 Muslims to prevent the visit from taking place.
As a result, the visit is cancelled and Congressman Abdullah praises Allah for delivering a victory to the Muslim community.
Of course, this couldn’t possibly happen in the United States, right? Read the commentary below, roll the clock back thirty years, and ask yourself how many Brits do you think would have believed it could happen in Great Britain today?
What was unthinkable in Great Britain thirty years ago is reality today. This is “cultural jihad” at work.
Twenty years ago who would have believed that today Harvard would create “women only” gym hours to meet the demands of Muslims. Or a state legislature would allow an imam to open its session with a prayer that calls on “victory over those who disbelieve.”
Or the Fairfax County (Virginia) police department dropping an anti-terrorism training program after complaints from Muslim police officers – one of whom was engaging in the various types of subversion the training program was intended to prevent.
For the British Parliament to abandon its right to free speech by knuckling under to the intimidation tactics by Lord Ahmed will only invite more – and bolder – tactics. To think that we in America can follow the path Great Britain has trod and not end up dealing with the same intimidation tactics is the worst form of wishful thinking.
Lord Ahmed threatens Parliament into submission
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/01/lord-ahmed-threatens-parliament-into.html
Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.
It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.
But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is reported that he ‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the event to court’.
And so Fitna has been cancelled: it shall not now be screened in the House of Lords on 29th January.
The Pakistani Press is jubliant, and Lord Ahmed is praising Allah for delivering ‘a victory for the Muslim community’.
It is a sorry state of affairs indeed that a parliament whose liberties have been forged through centuries of religious intolerance should succumb to the threats of one intolerant Muslim. Lord Ahmed is manifesting a notion of Divine Right, and one suspects it is precisely the sort of defence of Islam that Prince Charles shall make when he is sworn ‘Defender of Faith’. The blasphemy laws are being re-forged to protect one god, one faith and one prophet; they no longer defend YHWH, Christianity, Jesus Christ or the Church of England. Lord Ahmed is not functioning as a Labour peer; he is the self-appointed khalifa of all things Islamic. He is not concerned to protect freedom of expression or freedom of speech, but to stifle debate and ensure that Parliament submits to the Dar Al-Islam.
It is for moments such as these that one might hope the Lords Spiritual might enter the fray and defend the right of the noble baroness to extend an invitation to a democratically-elected Dutch MP. Their silence is deafening. They no longer believe anything strongly for fear of causing offence; they no longer defend anything for fear of being abolished.
If Lord Ahmed had threatened Cranmer with ‘10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House’, His Grace would have assured his Lordship of 100,000 people of all faiths and none to prevent the Muslims from preventing Mr Wilders from entering the House.
There are occasions when turning the other cheek is sheer folly.
Ce porc est un assassin ! Il a tué au volant de sa voiture un père de deux enfants ! Et c'est cette racaille que l'on laisse menacer la liberté d'expression ?
The 51-year-old peer faces a maximum of two years in jail after he admitted sending and receiving a series of five text messages while driving in the dark at more than 60mph along a 17-mile stretch of the M1.
A short time later, he crashed into the back of an Audi that had hit the central reservation and was sitting the fast lane, killing the driver, Martyn Gombar.
Lord Ahmed appeared at Sheffield Magistrates' Court and pleaded guilty to dangerous driving on the southbound carriageway of the M1, between junctions 40 and 35 near Rotherham, South Yorks, on Christmas Day last year.
He was handed an interim driving ban until his sentencing on December 22.
Speaking outside court, his solicitor Steve Smith said his client was not to blame for Mr Gombar's death.
"It clearly shows now that he was not responsible for the death of that unfortunate man," Mr Smith said. "Whilst it is not his responsibility, it is not his fault, he still bears the death of this man at the forefront of his mind."
Mr Gombar, a Slovakian father-of-two living in Leigh, Manchester, had crashed and his Audi had spun around, sitting in the fast lane facing on-coming traffic.
He and his passenger had got out of the car and reached the safety of the hard shoulder before deciding to go back to his vehicle to get his mobile phone so he could raise the alarm.
It was then that Lord Ahmed, who was in his Jaguar X-type with his wife, Sakina, 49, and his mother, Rashim, crashed into the back of the Audi at around 6.20pm, killing Mr Gombar. Lord Ahmed and his passengers all sustained minor injuries.
It was claimed after the crash that a message was sent from his car three minutes before the same phone was used to dial 999 following the crash.
The first Muslim peer of modern times, Lord Ahmed, a father of three, was appointed to the House of Lords in 1998 and has lived in Rotherham since childhood.
He has become one of the most prominent Islamic politicians in Britain and played a role in easing tensions between communities after the 2005 terror attacks on London.
Last year he also flew to the Sudan to help secure the release of the British teacher Gillian Gibbons, who had been arrested and faced a public flogging after allowing her pupils to name their class teddy Mohammed.
A JP and a property developer, he helps with various charitable causes and is on the board of several organisations.
They include South Yorkshire Victim Support, of which he is president, and the British Heart Foundation, of which he is a trustee.
In 2006 he signed an open letter to Tony Blair criticising the Government's foreign policy.
A year later, after Salman Rushdie was given a knighthood, he said he was "appalled" to hear of an award for "a man who has not only been abusive to Muslims, but also to Christians".
He denied rumours earlier this year that he was ready to defect to the Conservative party. He is a good friend of the Conservative peer Baroness Warsi, with whom he flew to Sudan with to help free Mrs Gibbons.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire